Body mass index is a heavy topic.
Spring has arrived in the Northeast and people are getting back to their exercise schedules. I was thinking about this topic as I was reading Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2018. One of the big topics in this issue is body mass index (BMI) (Z68.-).
The Official Coding Guidelines state that the BMI may be documented by other clinicians, but the associated diagnosis (such as obesity) must be documented by the patient’s provider. This issue is also supported by the Coding Clinic which goes on to state that “overweight” must meet the conditions for reporting a secondary diagnosis. Those conditions are the following:
This issue of Coding Clinic supports that the BMI can only be reported whenever a weight diagnosis is documented by the provider. Failure to thrive (adult – R62.7; child over 28 days old – R62.51) and underweight (R63.6) are considered weight diagnoses so the BMI is appropriate to report. For those who are reporting Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs), remember that morbid obesity (E66.01) is an HCC and would be supported by the BMI. Morbid obesity and obesity (E66.9) are always reportable when documented by the provider.
The ICD-10-CM BMI code for patients at age 20 is based on the classification direction which is pediatric. This guidance was given knowing that the Center for Disease Control (CDC) growth charts for patients 20 years old are listed as adult. The coder is required to follow the classification based on the Official Coding and Reporting Guidelines.
Many electronic medical records (EMRs) list the BMI automatically. These codes are not intended for routine capture.
It is not appropriate to assign the diagnosis code based on BMI. This topic was discussed in the Official Coding Guidelines, Section I.A.19, “Code assignment is not based on clinical criteria used by the provider to establish the diagnosis.” (The topic was also discussed in Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2016, pg. 147-149.) Code assignment is based on the physician’s documentation for the weight diagnosis.
Some new insight in this issue was to not code the BMI for OB patients. This information is reflected in the update of the Official Coding and Reporting Guidelines. It is appropriate to report “obesity complicating pregnancy (O99.21-),” if documented by the provider.
It is important to report these codes accurately as the BMI less than 20 or greater than 40 is considered a complication/comorbid condition (CC) in the Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG) methodology. These codes are also part of the HCC methodology as well as the Shared Services Program (SSP). Because of their “weight” throughout healthcare reimbursement methodologies, they can be targeted for regulatory review.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) has done reviews on the topic of malnutrition with millions of dollars returned to Medicare. So be careful, where you code weight and ensure that the clinical documentation and coding guidance supports the condition and associated BMI.
Resources:
2019 Official Coding and Reporting Guidelines
Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2018
Healthcare has been transitioning toward a more digital, interconnected ecosystem for many years, but the pace and magnitude of current changes represent a fundamental shift.
H.R. 1 doesn’t directly rewrite ICD-10 or CPT, but it does change the environment in which you’re coding. The impact is mostly indirect – through
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
