CMS Ventilator Education Goes Astray

CMS Ventilator Education Goes Astray

Following all the rules can be complicated. And sadly, following all the rules is not optional. Mary Inman frequently reports here on the consequences of not following the rules, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) releases a daily email with all the new Medicare criminals, delineating their malfeasance.

But keeping up really is hard. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) releases new rules on a regular basis, and then they release transmittals explaining the application of the new rules. They then issue new guidance documents explaining the transmittals. They publish MLN Matters on a regular basis, with education on common topics for which they think new education is warranted. And the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) release their own education. Who has the time to read all that?

But sometimes, things go wrong. Last week the CMS weekly MLN Connects Newsletter had an article in the compliance section that caught my attention. It was titled “Mechanical Ventilation: Bill Correctly for Inpatient Claims.” For those who are unaware, for several Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs), including sepsis, if the patient is mechanically ventilated for more than 96 hours, the DRG changes to a much higher-valued DRG, and hence a significantly higher payment (and with that, the risk of overpayment).

At first glance, this article reminded me that we still have not seen any sign of the Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report (PEPPER) making its long-awaited return – and mechanical ventilation over 96 hours was one of the measures. How long can it take CMS to revamp it? Heck, we have been waiting so long that 98-year-old Mel Brooks even has had time to plan and announce a sequel to Spaceballs.

So, I eagerly started reading the article, and there was a link to the OIG report from last August. That report found a not-so-impressive 6.8-percent error rate in their audit. And as they always do, the OIG recommended that CMS educate providers on properly counting ventilator hours. I will admit, though, that this really should not be that hard; the coder looks for the time and date on the note that was written when the patient was intubated and the note when the patient was extubated. But apparently, some are not doing it right – or perhaps they are counting the hours correctly, but are using the wrong ICD-10-PCS code to the claim.

Nonetheless, I was eager to see what new education CMS was providing, so I read on. And the next section said “On your claims for mechanical ventilation, use the right procedure and diagnosis codes, including codes for the correct number of hours. Review the ventilators provider compliance tip for more information.” And so I opened that link.

Lo and behold, what did I find but links to instructions and the national coverage determination for proper documentation, coding, and billing for patients who are on home ventilators, which are considered Durable Medical Equipment (DME). Not one word about mechanical ventilation in the hospital.

What happened here? Well, I discussed this with a prominent compliance expert, and she wondered if perhaps DOGE installed artificial intelligence to replace humans to write the MLN Connects, and the computer did not understand the difference between in-hospital mechanical ventilation and home ventilators. It certainly seems that a human would have noticed that the educational material had nothing to do with the topic.

I did report this to CMS, and I am sure they will correct it, but will it happen again with other topics? You know I’ll be watching.

EDITOR’S NOTE:

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, ACPA-C, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors, and the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24