CMS Sends Up Warning Flare on Discharge Planning

CMS Sends Up Warning Flare on Discharge Planning

Back in June, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released a memo titled “Requirements for Hospital Discharges to Post-Acute Care Providers,” which was sent to survey agencies that received no notice at all. Fortunately, I came across it and can now share it with everyone.

But a bit of background first.

We all know that CMS has regulations about discharge planning, as found in 42 CFR 482.43. These regulations were modified in 2019. Most notable was the requirement to provide information on post-acute care providers’ resource use and quality of care. CMS also expanded the requirement to offer choices, to include long-term acute-care hospitals (LTACHs) and inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), in addition to home care and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), although they continue to note that patients should always be offered choices for any provider to which they are being referred.

CMS also publishes interpretive guidelines that accompany every section of the Conditions of Participation that guide survey organizations when scrutinizing a facility for compliance with the regulations. These are very helpful in that they outline what the surveyors will do. But in the case of the 2019 changes to the discharge planning rules, CMS still has not released the interpretive guidelines, leaving the survey organizations to make things up as they go.

With that background, according to this memo, CMS has received reports of patients being transferred to post-acute care providers without adequate information – and they are not happy. As a result, they are alerting survey organizations to address some specific deficiencies.

So, what are the issues?

First, not telling the post-acute provider that the patient had behavioral issues that required additional care. While at the time of transfer, the patient may not have needed a sitter, the use of the sitter during the stay would alert the post-acute provider that there is a potential for behavioral issues.

Next, CMS called out poor medication reconciliation, especially omitting the patient’s use of psychotropics and opioids during a hospital stay. They note that in some instances, patients with ongoing opioid medications were not sent with a hard copy of the prescription, resulting in inability of the facility to obtain the medication in a timely manner. CMS also noted that post-acute providers were not informed about skin issues that required treatment in the hospital.

CMS went on to note that some post-acute providers were not informed that the patient had durable medical equipment (DME), such as BiPAP or a wound vac. In this case, the patient would arrive with the immediate need for DME, but the post-acute provider would not have had time to arrange the delivery to the facility. Next was lack of communication about the patient’s home environment that would be relevant to the post-acute provider when planning for discharge from their facility, including omitting information that the patient was homeless or had no caregiver.

Now, just reading the list of issues, the pessimist in me sees a pattern of hospitals that omitted crucial information, perhaps in order to get a post-acute provider to accept a patient who was challenging or costly. Obviously, this is not acceptable. No hospital likes to have a patient who is stable for discharge but has no safe destination – but the solution is not to deceptively transfer the patient so they become someone else’s problem. Of course, many of these errors may have been inadvertent, with perhaps the discharging staff unaware that the patient required a sitter when the patient was on another hospital unit or unaware of the extent of skin breakdown, because the wound care nurse was managing that aspect of the patient’s care.

CMS also noted that hospitals have been omitting information about the patient’s goals of care and treatment preferences. CMS is very big on ensuring that medical decisions are made in collaboration with the patient, so we need to ensure that we are asking patients about their goals of care and treatment preferences – and documenting their preferences. They also called out patient preferences for end-of-life care, suggesting that some patients who did not want resuscitation were resuscitated anyway, because that information was not conveyed to the facility.

So, what do you do?

Download this document and read it, then assess your discharge program. CMS even provides a link within the document to a discharge checklist. They do not endorse this form, but if they link to it, you know they like it.

Finally, it is crucial to note that this memo was addressed to survey agencies. CMS is telling them to focus their reviews on these issues. If that’s not a red flag to be sure that your processes are in order, I don’t know what is.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, ACPA-C, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors, and the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

2026 IPPS Masterclass 3: Master MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 14, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 13, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass 1: Master ICD-10-CM Changes

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 1: Master ICD-10-CM Changes

This first session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature an in-depth explanation of FY26 changes to ICD-10-CM codes and guidelines, CCs/MCCs, and revisions to the MCE, presented by presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 12, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.

June 19, 2025
Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Bring your questions and join the conversation during this open forum series, live every Wednesday at 10 a.m. EST from June 11–July 30. Hosted by Chuck Buck, these fast-paced 30-minute sessions connect you directly with top healthcare experts tackling today’s most urgent compliance and policy issues.

June 11, 2025
Open Door Forum: The Changing Face of Addiction: Coding, Compliance & Care

Open Door Forum: The Changing Face of Addiction: Coding, Compliance & Care

Substance abuse is everywhere. It’s a complicated diagnosis with wide-ranging implications well beyond acute care. The face of addiction continues to change so it’s important to remember not just the addict but the spectrum of extended victims and the other social determinants and legal ramifications. Join John K. Hall, MD, JD, MBA, FCLM, FRCPC, for a critical Q&A on navigating substance abuse in 2025.  Register today and be a part of the conversation!

July 16, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24