CMS removes SDoH reporting in OPPS CY 26 Final rule

CMS removes SDoH reporting in OPPS CY 26 Final rule

In the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC Final Rule, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) formally finalized the removal the Screening for Social Drivers of Health and Screen Positive Rate for Social Drivers measures from the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR), Rural Emergency Hospital Quality Reporting (REHQR), and Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality Reporting (ASCQR) programs.

Although this was not a surprise, based on the previous rulings, it is helpful to comb through the comments and responses to gain an understanding of why changes were made and what should be anticipated for future CMS changes related to quality reporting for health and wellbeing.

The decision follows a significant volume of public comments that reflected a wide diversity of perspectives on the value, burden, and future direction of SDoH measurements.

According to the final ruling, many commenters did support the removal of the two SDoH measures, emphasizing that the measures require substantial resources for data collection and manual processes. They argued that these activities divert staff from core patient-care activities and do not demonstrate whether facilities are actually addressing the underlying social risk factors identified during screening.

There was also mention of frustration with the duplication of the same screening questions across settings.

Many ambulatory surgery center (ASC) commenters emphasized that ASCs do not provide longitudinal care and often lack social work resources or community-specific knowledge for their patients. Some highlighted that staffing assumptions embedded within the measures, such as maintaining social workers, were unrealistic for ASC settings.

There was also a subset of commenters who understood the removal of these questions but reiterated their commitment to health equity work. These organizations reported positive outcomes in the collection that have already occurred, such as reduced readmissions and lower emergency department use when connecting patients to community-based resources. These providers emphasized they would continue SDoH screening voluntarily.

At the same time, many commenters opposed the removal of the SDoH measures, arguing these measures are in line with the CMS broader health goals and with the Make America Healthy Again initiative. Several urged CMS to either retain the measures or pause implementation to refine measure specifications, rather than a full removal. Others suggested voluntary reporting options to reduce burden while still supporting national data collection.

Commenters also encouraged CMS to use SDoH related ICD-10 Z codes for quality data reporting and consider how to align with external frameworks such as the NCQA HEDIS SNS-E measure, the HL7 Gravity Project, and USCDI standards. There were also recommendations for the development of future measures that assess the connections made to community resources rather than screening alone. The CMS response was telling that their focus is on reducing the cost of unnecessary reporting, while they evaluate alternative measures. However, it still appears that future measures have not been selected at this time.

At this time, the responses from CMS demonstrate an interest more in outcome driven metrics, rather than screening metrics. The agency is clearly signaling a broader, more predictive and holistic direction for future outpatient quality measurement. In the final rule, CMS specifically sought comments on the potential development of health and well-being measures, including tools that capture a person’s overall health, emotional state, social connectedness, sense of purpose, and life satisfaction.

CMS also requested feedback on the relevance and feasibility of tools that assess complementary and integrative health, self-care capability, and patient skill-building. Although commentators provided numerous evidence-based tools options for CMS, no final selection has been made for CY 2026.

Healthcare organizations should be prepared that a likely selection will be assessing patient preventative behaviors, nutritional outcomes, self-management capacity, and non-traditional supports (social connections) that contribute to long-term outcomes and cost containment.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM

Tiffany Ferguson is CEO of Phoenix Medical Management, Inc., the care management company. Tiffany serves on the ACPA Observation Subcommittee. Tiffany is a contributor to RACmonitor, Case Management Monthly, and commentator for Finally Friday. After practicing as a hospital social worker, she went on to serve as Director of Case Management and quickly assumed responsibilities in system level leadership roles for Health and Care Management and c-level responsibility for a large employed medical group. Tiffany received her MSW at UCLA. She is a licensed social worker, ACM, and CMAC certified.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24