Both rules would do more than merely impact payment.
Federal officials this week unveiled a pair of proposed rules that are likely to have significant ramifications for hospice and skilled nursing facility (SNF) providers nationwide.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) rules 1754-P and 1756-P were issued on Thursday, along with lengthy fact sheets for each. Comments from providers are currently being accepted.
To summarize, the proposals would provide updates to policies and rates for hospices and SNFs for the 2022 fiscal year (FY). The hospice rule additionally proposes to “rebase the hospice labor shares and clarify certain aspects of the hospice election statement addendum requirements,” according to the CMS fact sheets, while the SNF rule includes proposals for the SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP) and the SNF Value-Based Program (VBP).
Hospice Proposed Rule
In addition to simply updating policies and rates, the hospice rule proposes more fundamental changes to the Hospice Conditions of Participation (CoPs) and Hospice Quality Reporting Program (HQRP), officials said. The rule also includes a Home Health Quality Reporting Program (HHQRP) proposal to display publicly certain outcome and assessment information set (OASIS) data following lapses occurring due to exemptions spurred by the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) during the first half of 2020.
“CMS is committed to addressing consistent and persistent inequities in health outcomes by improving data collection to measure and analyze disparities across programs and policies that apply to the HQRP,” CMS said. “We will obtain this feedback through this request for information (RFI) on ways to achieve health equity for all patients through policy solutions that apply to the HQRP and our other quality reporting programs.”
CMS is also proposing to rebase and revise labor shares for all four levels of care using 2018 Medicare cost reports (MCR) data for freestanding hospice facilities. This rule also proposes several clarifying regulation text changes on certain aspects of the hospice election statement addendum requirements that were finalized for hospice elections beginning in October 2020.
Hospices would see an estimated 2.3 percent ($530 million) increase in their payments under the provisions of the proposed rule, based on the estimated 2.5 percent inpatient hospital market basket reduced by the multifactor productivity adjustment (0.2 percentage point). The hospice payment update also includes a statutory aggregate cap that limits overall payments per patient made to a hospice annually.
The CoPs alterations proposed in the rule pertain to hospice aide competency evaluation standards, which were relaxed as part of the federal pandemic response.
“We issued this waiver to promote greater flexibility and reduce burden, allowing hospices to focus on delivering improved patient care during the COVID-19 PHE,” CMS said. “The agency believes that this PHE waiver should be made permanent, and is proposing the use of the ‘pseudo-patient’ for hospice aide competency training.”
A notable change proposed for the HQRP is titled the “Hospice Care Index,” consisting of a single measure encompassing 10 indicators of quality, calculated from claims data.
“Collectively, the indicators represent different aspects of hospice care, and aim to convey a comprehensive characterization of the quality of care furnished by a hospice,” officials said.
If finalized, the measure would be publicly reported no earlier than May 2022. In a related move, CMS is also proposing to add Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Hospice Survey Star ratings on Care Compare, allowing consumers to weigh provider decisions in a more straightforward manner.
To review CMS‑1754-P in its entirety, download it from the Federal Register online at https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/current. To view the associated fact sheet issued by CMS, go to https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/fiscal-year-2022-hospice-payment-rate-update-proposed-rule-cms-1754-p
For more information on this topic generally, go to the hospice center webpage: http://www.cms.gov/Center/Provider-Type/Hospice-Center.html.
SNF Proposed Rule
CMS estimates that the payment policies in the SNF proposed rule would result in an increase of approximately $444 million in payments to such providers in FY 2022. But that sum is dwarfed by what officials described as an “unintended” increase resulting from a policy implemented in 2019.
“On Oct. 1, 2019, CMS implemented a new case-mix classification model, called the Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM). When finalizing PDPM, CMS stated that this new payment model would be implemented in a budget-neutral manner, meaning that the transition to this new payment model would not result in an increase or decrease in aggregate SNF spending,” CMS explained. “Since PDPM implementation, currently available data suggest an unintended increase in payments of approximately 5 percent, or $1.7 billion, in FY 2020. As with past payment model transitions, CMS has conducted the data analysis to recalibrate the parity adjustment used to achieve budget neutrality under PDPM.”
Still, federal officials acknowledged that the COVID PHE could have affected the data used to perform the relevant analyses. Accordingly, in the proposed rule, CMS noted that it is “soliciting broad public comments on a potential methodology for recalibrating the PDPM parity adjustment that would account for the potential effects of the COVID-19 PHE without compromising the accuracy of the adjustment.”
CMS also seeks comment on whether any necessary adjustment should be delayed or phased in over time to provide payment stability.
It wasn’t the only citation of the PDPM in the new proposed rule. In response to “stakeholder feedback, and to improve consistency between the ICD-10 code mappings and current ICD-10 coding guidelines,” CMS also proposed changes to the mappings, affecting the areas of sickle-cell disease, esophageal conditions, multisystem inflammatory syndrome, neonatal cerebral infarction, vaping-related disorder, and anoxic brain damage.
As for the SNF QRP, officials said they are proposing the adoption of a new claims-based measure, SNF HAI (Healthcare-Associated Infections). The measure would use claims data to estimate the rate of HAIs acquired during SNF care and resulting in hospitalization, with some of the conditions identified in the measure to include sepsis, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia.
“The goal of the measure is to be able to assess those SNFs that have notably higher rates of HAIs that are acquired during SNF care and result in hospitalization, when compared to their peers and to the national average HAI rate,” CMS said. “Implementation of the SNF HAI measure provides information about a facility’s adeptness in infection prevention and management and encourages improved quality of care.”
Regarding the SNF VBP, officials said they are proposing to suppress the SNF 30-Day All-Cause Readmission Measure for 2022, because “circumstances caused by the COVID-19 PHE have affected the measure and the resulting performance scores significantly.”
“Specifically, to address the possible distortion of performance scores and incentive payment multipliers, CMS is proposing to assign a performance score of zero to all participating SNFs, irrespective of how they perform using the previously finalized scoring methodology,” CMS noted. “Then, to maintain compliance with the existing payback percentage policy (per statute, the SNF VBP Program must withhold 2 percent of SNF Medicare Part A FFS payment and redistribute 50-70 percent of the withhold to SNFs in the form of incentive payments), CMS is proposing to reduce the otherwise applicable federal per diem rate for each SNF by 2 percent and award SNFs 60 percent of that withhold, resulting in a 1.2 percent payback percentage to those SNFs, except for SNFs that are subject to the Low Volume Adjustment policy.”
CMS also noted that the newly passed Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 included a provision allowing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to expand the SNF VBP program and apply up to 10 measures with respect to payments, beginning in FY 2024, which “may include measures of functional status, patient safety, care coordination, or patient experience.”
“In expanding the SNF VBP measure set, CMS is also considering measures that we already require for Long-Term Care Facilities (LTCFs), which include both SNFs and nursing facilities (NFs), to collect and report under other initiatives such as Nursing Home Compare,” CMS said. “Approximately 94 percent of LTCFs are dually certified as both a SNF and NF, and the vast majority of LTCF residents are also Medicare beneficiaries. The expanded SNF VBP measure set would assess the quality of care that LTCFs provide to all LTCF residents, regardless of payor, as it would best represent the quality of care provided to all Medicare beneficiaries in the facility.”
To review CMS-1756-P in its entirety, go to the Federal Register’s Public Inspection Desk, where it will be available under “Special Filings” at http://www.federalregister.gov/inspection.aspx. To view the associated fact sheet released by CMS, go to https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/fiscal-year-fy-2022-skilled-nursing-facility-prospective-payment-system-proposed-rule-cms-1746-p.
Programming Note: Listen to former CMS official Stanley Nachimson’s analysis on the new proposed rules from CMS in a two part series. Part I can be heard on Monitor Mondays, Monday, April 12, and Part II when he concludes his two-part series on Talk Ten Tuesdays, April 13. Both live broadcasts begin at 10 a.m. Eastern.
There is a lot of talk lately about the need to follow orders given by a member of law enforcement. I would like to explore
In last week’s article, I focused on the screening and discharge planning policy requirements for §482.43 Discharge Planningfound in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
