In my view, the latest change to this guideline is the best so far.
The current definition of the root operation Control is “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural or other acute bleeding.”
Since the implementation of ICD-10-PCS on Oct. 1, 2015, this definition and associated guideline have undergone several revisions. Effective with discharges on and after Oct. 1, 2021, guideline B3.7, Control vs. more specific root operations, is being tweaked yet again. Before delving into what’s new, let’s take a walk down memory lane and see how we got here.
The first change came in fiscal year 2017, and significantly altered how we code for hemorrhage control. The original intent of this root operation was to stop or attempt to stop postprocedural bleeding. In 2017, the definition was expanded to include control of either postprocedural or other acute bleeding, and the guideline was updated to reflect this change. The original guideline went on to state that if an attempt to stop the bleeding is initially unsuccessful and any of the definitive root operations of Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection are performed, that definitive root operation is coded instead.
Differences between the versions are highlighted in bold:
|
FY 2016 |
FY 2017 |
|
B3.7 Control vs. more definitive root operations The root operation Control is defined as “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural bleeding.” If an attempt to stop postprocedural bleeding is initially unsuccessful, and to stop the bleeding requires performing any of the definitive root operations Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection, then that root operation is coded instead of Control. Example: Resection of spleen to stop postprocedural bleeding is coded to Resection instead of Control. |
B3.7 Control vs. more definitive root operations The root operation Control is defined as “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural or other acute bleeding.” If an attempt to stop postprocedural or other acute bleeding is initially unsuccessful, and to stop the bleeding requires performing any of the definitive root operations Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection, then that root operation is coded instead of Control. Example: Resection of spleen to stop bleeding is coded to Resection instead of Control. |
In 2018, what looked like a minor change to the guidelines made another big change to how we code. The addition of the words “such as” indicated this list was not all inclusive, and there could be other root operations used to control bleeding outside of those listed in the guideline. For example, I remember seeing discussion boards around this time discussing the appropriate root operation to use for embolization of an arterial bleed for treatment of a bleeding stomach ulcer. Embolization in this situation is coded as Occlusion, but it’s not on that list.
|
FY 2017 |
FY 2018 |
|
B3.7 Control vs. more definitive root operations The root operation Control is defined as “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural or other acute bleeding.” If an attempt to stop postprocedural or other acute bleeding is initially unsuccessful, and to stop the bleeding requires performing any of the definitive root operations Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection, then that root operation is coded instead of Control. Example: Resection of spleen to stop bleeding is coded to Resection instead of Control. |
B3.7 Control vs. more definitive root operations The root operation Control is defined as “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural or other acute bleeding.” If an attempt to stop postprocedural or other acute bleeding is initially unsuccessful, and to stop the bleeding requires performing a more definitive root operation, such as Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection, then the more definitive root operation is coded instead of Control. Example: Resection of spleen to stop bleeding is coded to Resection instead of Control. |
The 2018 guideline change also left another questionable word in the definition: “initially.” The use of this root operation was supposed to be a secondary attempt to achieve hemostasis, but that was also causing coder confusion. What constitutes an initial unsuccessful attempt? So, in the following year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) removed that word.
|
FY 2019 |
|
B3.7 Control vs. more definitive root operations The root operation Control is defined as “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural or other acute bleeding.” If an attempt to stop postprocedural or other acute bleeding is initially unsuccessful, and to stop the bleeding requires performing a more definitive root operation, such as Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection, then the more definitive root operation is coded instead of Control. Example: Resection of spleen to stop bleeding is coded to Resection instead of Control. |
In my view, the latest change to this guideline is the best so far. First off, the guideline title is being changed from “Control vs. more definitive root operations” to “Control vs. more specific root operations.” Second, it specifies that this root operation is to be used when the procedure performed to control bleeding is above and beyond normal hemostasis measures considered integral to the primary surgical procedure. Third, it adds language clarifying the use of a more specific root operation rather than Control. And finally, three distinct examples are given to show when the root operation Control is used, when a more specific root operation is used, and when no additional code is necessary.
|
FY 2022 |
|
B3.7 Control vs. more specific root operations The root operation Control is defined as “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural or other acute bleeding.” Control is the root operation coded when the procedure performed to achieve hemostasis, beyond what would be considered integral to a procedure, utilizes techniques (e.g. cautery, application of substances or pressure, suturing or ligation or clipping of bleeding points at the site) that are not described by a more specific root operation definition, such as Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection. If a more specific root operation definition applies to the procedure performed, then the more specific root operation is coded instead of Control. Example: Silver nitrate cautery to treat acute nasal bleeding is coded to the root operation Control. Example: Liquid embolization of the right internal iliac artery to treat acute hematoma by stopping blood flow is coded to the root operation Occlusion. Example: Suctioning of residual blood to achieve hemostasis during a transbronchial cryobiopsy is considered integral to the cryobiopsy procedure and is not coded separately. |
If you’ve been struggling to unpack coding guidance for control of postoperative or acute bleeding, this is your year! It’s frustrating that it sometimes takes several years to get a coding guideline “right,” but I think they’ve finally done it.
As coders, we are familiar with the ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance (C&M) Committee. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) describes it as a
Coding in the post-acute care world has taken on a new significance in the past five years. For those of us who are coders, this
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Stop revenue leakage and boost hospital performance by mastering risk adjustment and HCCs. This essential webcast with expert Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, will reveal how inaccurate patient acuity documentation leads to lost reimbursements through penalties from poor quality scores. Learn the critical differences between HCCs and traditional CCs/MCCs, adapt your CDI workflows, and ensure accurate payments in Medicare Advantage and value-based care models. Perfect for HIM leaders, coders, and CDI professionals. Don’t miss this chance to protect your hospital’s revenue and reputation!
Struggling with ICD-10-CM coding for diabetes and complications? This expert-led webcast clarifies complex combination codes, documentation gaps, and sequencing rules to reduce denials and ensure compliance. Dr. Angela Comfort will provide actionable strategies to accurately link diabetes to complications, improve provider documentation, and optimize reimbursement—helping coders, CDI specialists, and HIM leaders minimize audit risks and strengthen revenue integrity. Don’t miss this chance to master diabetes coding with real-world case studies, key takeaways, and live Q&A!
Uncover critical guidance. HIM coding expert, Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, provides an interactive review on important information in each of the AHA’s 2025 ICD-10-CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics in easy-to-access on-demand webcasts, available shortly after each official publication.
Uncover critical guidance. Kay Piper provides an interactive review on coding guidelines and more in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2025 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Stay ahead of Medicare Advantage’s 2025-2026 regulatory changes in this critical webcast featuring expert Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM. Learn how new CMS rules limit MA plan denials, protect hospitals from retroactive claim reopenings, and modify Two-Midnight Rule enforcement—plus key insights on omitted SDoH mandates and heightened readmission scrutiny. Discover actionable strategies to safeguard revenue, ensure compliance, and adapt to evolving health equity priorities before the June 2025 deadline. Essential for hospitals, revenue cycle teams, and compliance professionals navigating MA’s shifting landscape.
Struggling with CMS’s 3-Day Payment Window? Join compliance expert Michael G. Calahan, PA, MBA, CCO, to master billing restrictions for pre-admission and inter-facility services. Learn how to avoid audit risks, optimize revenue cycle workflows, and ensure compliance across departments. Critical for C-suite leaders, providers, coders, revenue cycle teams, and compliance teams—this webcast delivers actionable strategies to protect reimbursements and meet federal regulations.
Providers face increasing Medicare audits when using skin substitute grafts, leaving many unprepared for claim denials and financial liabilities. Join veteran healthcare attorney Andrew B. Wachler, Esq., in this essential webcast and master the Medicare audit process, learn best practices for compliant billing and documentation, and mitigate fraud and abuse risks. With actionable insights and a live Q&A session, you’ll gain the tools to defend your practice and ensure compliance in this rapidly evolving landscape.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch dives into the basics of Medicare for clinicians to be successful as utilization review professionals. He’ll break down what Medicare does and doesn’t pay for, what services it provides and how hospitals get paid for providing those services – including both inpatient and outpatient. Learn how claims are prepared and how much patients must pay for their care. By attending our webcast, you will gain a new understanding of these issues and be better equipped to talk to patients, to their medical staff, and to their administrative team.
Copyright © 2025 ICD10monitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
