Cause and Effect: Understanding Federal Delays

Cause and Effect: Understanding Federal Delays

The Trump Administration has put a hold on a federal program designed to increase oversight of hospice care, which receives over $25 billion annually from Medicare. This pause is meant to root out and eliminate fraud and waste and address fraudulent billing and improper patient enrollments.

The program, initiated during the Biden administration, required noncompliant hospices to take corrective action or face expulsion from Medicare. The pause amounts to a win for the hospice industry, which said the Biden plan would penalize well-meaning operators without identifying underperforming ones.

Also, agencies must undertake a sweeping legal review by identifying regulations that—in the context of this administration’s views—are unconstitutional or “raise serious constitutional difficulties;” are based on “unlawful delegations of legislative power;” implicate issues of social, political, or economic significance that are not clearly authorized by statute; or are inconsistent with “the best reading” of the agency’s statutory authority. With this directive, President Trump is requiring agencies—in consultation with DOGE, the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Department of Justice (DOJ)—to identify rules that current leaders believe raise constitutional questions or administrative law issues. This includes identifying rules that could implicate the major questions doctrine, the nondelegation doctrine, and recent Supreme Court decisions such as Loper Bright.

It is not clear how the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) and other key health care agencies will approach this directive. But this process likely puts many health care rules in the crosshairs. In addition to the prospect of litigation by outside parties (as was predicted after Loper Bright), many current health care rules could be targeted by those entrusted with enforcing existing requirements and implementing major health care programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). Indeed, the executive order explicitly directs agencies to, where appropriate, deprioritize enforcement of rules that it believes are potentially unlawful, which could lead to the termination of civil or criminal enforcement efforts and the use of additional enforcement discretion.

Agencies must conduct a policy review by identifying regulations that—based on this administration’s views—impose significant costs on private parties that are not outweighed by benefits to the public; impede technological innovation, infrastructure development, disaster response, inflation reduction, research and development, economic development, energy production, land use, or foreign policy objectives; impose undue burdens on small business; or impede private enterprise and entrepreneurship. Trump administration leaders are expected to use this process to identify ACA or Medicaid rules that, for instance, it believes do not benefit the public or impose significant burdens on private industry.

This approach appears to be consistent with that of the first Trump administration and the deregulatory efforts discussed above.

In other news, Dr. Mehmet Oz was confirmed April 3, 2025, which surprised me. I just didn’t know that the HHS Secretary was confirmed so much later then the President was confirmed. The confirmation of a Cabinet Secretary — like the HHH Secretary—is a process that follows the presidential inauguration. The president is sworn in on January 20, but Cabinet nominees require Senate confirmation, which can take weeks or even months.

Nomination happens soon after inauguration (sometimes even before).

Senate hearings and confirmation votes depend on committee scheduling, political negotiations, and background vetting.

April 3 confirmation, like with former HHS Secretary Alex Azar (in 2018) or Xavier Becerra (in 2021), isn’t abnormal.

So… is there no HHS Secretary until April?

Technically yes, but practically no.

There’s always someone in charge — even if not the Senate-confirmed Secretary.

During that time: an Acting Secretary is appointed — usually a senior career official or someone from the prior administration who’s willing to stay during the transition.

EDITOR’S NOTE:

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Knicole C. Emanuel Esq.

For more than 20 years, Knicole has maintained a health care litigation practice, concentrating on Medicare and Medicaid litigation, health care regulatory compliance, administrative law and regulatory law. Knicole has tried over 2,000 administrative cases in over 30 states and has appeared before multiple states’ medical boards. She has successfully obtained federal injunctions in numerous states, which allowed health care providers to remain in business despite the state or federal laws allegations of health care fraud, abhorrent billings, and data mining. Across the country, Knicole frequently lectures on health care law, the impact of the Affordable Care Act and regulatory compliance for providers, including physicians, home health and hospice, dentists, chiropractors, hospitals and durable medical equipment providers. Knicole is partner at Nelson Mullins and a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and a popular panelist on Monitor Monday.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Sepsis Sequencing in Focus: From Documentation to Defensible Coding

Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.

March 26, 2026
I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24