Case Mix Index – Proceed with Caution

Case Mix Index – Proceed with Caution

Last week I spoke at the annual revenue integrity symposium sponsored by the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity. And I really enjoy that conference; it’s a chance to discuss things other than admission status and learn a whole bunch of new abbreviations.

My talk was about key performance indicators (KPIs), and I am going to start with my conclusion, which is that they are terrible. Now, I cannot cover my whole hourlong talk in one article, but I can give you an example.

I bet every reader has heard from finance that you need to get a higher CMI, the case mix index. Now, granted, part of that is reasonable. We want to capture all applicable diagnoses so that the admission is assigned to the proper Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG), and the DRG weight is as high as possible, and as a result, the CMI will accurately reflect your overall patient acuity.

Of course, many of those diagnoses may not be complications or comorbidities (CCs) or major CCs (MCCs), and won’t affect the DRG weight, but they can influence the myriad risk scores.

But at the same time, those finance people also want you to find as many inpatient admissions as possible. They just don’t like patients hospitalized as outpatients, with or without observation services. After telling you to raise the CMI, they tell you to lower the observation rate.

So, what do you do? You double down on your utilization review activities, reviewing observation patients to get them admitted as inpatients as soon as it’s evident they will require a second midnight. You work hard with your doctors, getting them to document medical necessity for ongoing hospital care.

Your physician advisor, instead of sitting at a computer reviewing cases and arguing with payer medical directors, rounds on the units, talking to doctors, educating on the rules and documentation best practices, and participates in multi-disciplinary rounds, ensuring medical necessity, helping with problem discharges, and just providing moral support for the case managers.

And as a result of your hard work, your observation rate goes down and inpatient rate goes up. You catch a bunch of missed diagnoses and increase the specificity of many others. Your finance team should be delighted. But they aren’t. Why? Because your CMI dropped.

Why? Because all those inpatient conversions were for medical diagnoses, and because the patients weren’t “really sick,” they end up as lower-weighted DRGs, usually without a CC or MCC. Take chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) without a CC or MCC. That has a weight of 0.65.

That’s really low. And as a result, these lower-weighted inpatient admissions drive down the average CMI, and finance demands an explanation about why you disregarded their initiative.

And that’s truly messed up. You just got the hospital a DRG payment of perhaps $6,000 to $8,000, instead of the wimpy $2,648 observation payment, and they are upset? Do they really want you to stop all your efforts and leave those patients as observation?

It’s wrong; CMI is not a good key performance measure. If your finance team wants a higher CMI, tell them to hire more surgeons or start a transplant program so you can get new patients whose admissions have high weights.

Heart transplant with an MCC (and you should be able to find an MCC on that patient type) has a weight of 28. One of those will drive your average CMI up quite nicely.

So, if you are faced with raising the CMI, ask your finance team which they would prefer: a higher CMI, or more revenue.

And then decide what action to take.

EDITOR’S NOTE:

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, ACPA-C, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors, and the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

AI in Healthcare Documentation: Who’s Training Whom?

AI in Healthcare Documentation: Who’s Training Whom?

EDITOR’S NOTE: AI-assisted editing tools were used only for proofreading and language refinement; all analysis, interpretation, and conclusions reflect the author’s original work. Artificial intelligence

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 19, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24