Biden Administration Sued in Texas…Again

Biden Administration Sued in Texas…Again

The Biden Administration has found itself in court in the state of Texas again – but not over the No Surprises Act (NSA) this time! The American Hospital Association (AHA) and the Texas Hospital Association (THA), along with two Texas health systems, filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Texas asking the court to bar enforcement of a December 2022 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) bulletin stating that tracking technology hospitals use on public-facing websites and apps that connects an individual’s IP address or email to web traffic behavior is likely a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) violation.

In the lawsuit, the AHA argues that this bulletin is effectively a legislative rule, because it speaks to conduct that would be banned under HIPAA. It also states that this would be a “gross overreach by the federal bureaucracy” imposed without public input, contrary to the intent of HIPAA in the first place. The group notes that while hospitals and health systems certainly acknowledge and honor HIPAA provisions, sharing information with the public is key to public health and combatting misinformation – a key goal, especially coming out of the COVID-19 epidemic – and that the guidance harms the very people it is supposed to be protecting.

Citing HHS’s own words that “information is essential fuel for the engine of healthcare,” AHA listed the third-party tracking technologies that are key to enhancing hospital websites through gauging functionality, helpfulness, and what adjustments need to be made to publicize information and services. These technologies include analytic tools, which convert website visitors’ interactions on hospital websites into data that can be studied; video technologies that educate the community about health conditions and support virtual tours of facilities; translation tools that help non-English speakers access healthcare information; and map and location technologies that help visitors access healthcare based on their location. All these technologies use a website visitor’s IP address, and therefore potentially run afoul of the HHS bulletin.

So, how prevalent are these technologies that AHA and others found a lawsuit necessary? A recent Health Affairs study found that about 99 percent of the almost 3,800 hospitals studied utilized this type of tracking software.

But despite that prevalence, hospitals and health systems have felt unfairly targeted over the last few months. In July, HHS and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued warning letters to 130 organizations over the use of this technology, and went on to publicly post the names of the organizations for all to see. And the plaintiff groups also point out that the government itself often uses these tracking tools, giving three examples of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), Medicare.gov, and U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) web pages. They pointed this out, they say, not to force the government to stop using the technology, but to highlight the importance of it. The AHA President said the “rule for thee but not for me” approach of HHS was unexplainable, and has led to class-action litigation invoking the bulletin and significant financial costs for systems that have been forced to remove the technology from their websites to avoid legal action.

With all of that in mind, the lawsuit asks the court to declare that the information collected by all of these tools not be considered data protected under HIPAA, or at a minimum that the bulletin should have been subject to notice and comment. So now we wait to see how the administration fares in this Texas court.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Cate Brantley, JD

Cate Brantley is a Senior Government Affairs Liaison for Zelis. She has over 9 years of experience in both the public and private sector. Cate is licensed to practice law in the state of Oklahoma.

Related Stories

You Down with CfC?

You Down with CfC?

Anyone who has worked within the scope of hospital case/utilization management for any period of time has heard of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24