Ballot Initiatives: The New Political Tool Impacting Healthcare

Medlearn Media NPOS Non-patient outcome spending

The impact of ballot initiatives on healthcare seems to be growing.

By Matthew Albright

As of this past weekend, with Election Day still approaching, an estimated 40 million Americans had already voted through absentee ballots or ballot drop boxes.

We won’t attempt a guess about how the races for the House and the Senate will go. However, I will suggest that for the healthcare industry and its current regulatory burdens, whether any particular congressional chamber is blue or red will not make much difference.

This is because a lot of the heavy regulatory lifts for healthcare today have strikingly bipartisan support in an otherwise polarized political environment.

Take, for example, the transparency requirements that both hospitals and plans publish detailed lists of their pricing for specific services, including negotiated rates with one another. It’s true that the transparency rules are based on a few sentences in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, passed under President Obama, but the Trump Administration turned those few sentences into hundreds of pages of regulations.

The No Surprises Act was passed with strong bipartisan congressional support, also under the Trump Administration, including provider requirements on good-faith estimates and advanced explanations of benefits.

Although the genesis of the No Surprises Act and the transparency requirements occurred under a Republican administration, upon taking over, it is striking that the Biden Administration did not challenge those regulations – as the Administration did on many other regulations passed under Trump. Biden actually doubled down on them, writing extensive and ongoing regulations and promising enforcement of the requirements.

Interoperability too is bipartisan, from its birth under the younger President Bush as Meaningful Use to the most recent requirements under Biden.

So, whatever happens in the congressional elections, the outcome will likely not impact the current torrent of regulations that healthcare is now facing.

But let’s talk about another political tool on the ballot that has and will continue to impact healthcare, and that is the ballot initiative (also called ballot measures, popular initiatives, or voter initiatives). About half the states allow ballot initiatives, which are intended to create, amend, or repeal a state law or constitutional amendment.

Proponents of ballot initiatives say that they are direct democracy in action, pushing for policy that state legislatures have not or will not deal with appropriately. Opponents say that ballot initiatives are actually a frontal attack on democracy that gives too much power to small-interest groups with big marketing budgets.

Even though there are fewer ballot initiatives this year than we saw in most of the last 20 elections, their impact on healthcare seems to be growing. In recent elections, we’ve seen ballot questions in multiple states that have changed state policy on marijuana and Medicaid expansion. This week, across the country, citizens in various states will be voting on 28 ballot measures related to abortion.

Other ballot initiatives that affect healthcare this week:  

Massachusetts is asking voters to set an 83-percent medical loss ratio and add more regulations to dental plans.

Arizona’s Proposition 209 would reduce the maximum interest rates on consumer medical debt to 3 percent.

And a ballot initiative in Oregon would add an amendment to the state constitution stating that it is the obligation of the state to ensure that every citizen has affordable healthcare. 

While it may be that a vote for one party or the other won’t impact healthcare, one way or the other, these ballot initiatives will have an impact.

Hope you all voted!

Programming note: Listen for live legislative reports every Monday on Monitor Mondays and sponsored by Zelis.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Matthew Albright

Matthew Albright is the chief legislative affairs officer at Zelis Healthcare. Previously, Albright was senior manager at CAQH CORE, and earlier, he was the acting deputy director of the Office of E-Health and Services for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Related Stories

You Down with CfC?

You Down with CfC?

Anyone who has worked within the scope of hospital case/utilization management for any period of time has heard of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24