The impact of ballot initiatives on healthcare seems to be growing.
By Matthew Albright
As of this past weekend, with Election Day still approaching, an estimated 40 million Americans had already voted through absentee ballots or ballot drop boxes.
We won’t attempt a guess about how the races for the House and the Senate will go. However, I will suggest that for the healthcare industry and its current regulatory burdens, whether any particular congressional chamber is blue or red will not make much difference.
This is because a lot of the heavy regulatory lifts for healthcare today have strikingly bipartisan support in an otherwise polarized political environment.
Take, for example, the transparency requirements that both hospitals and plans publish detailed lists of their pricing for specific services, including negotiated rates with one another. It’s true that the transparency rules are based on a few sentences in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, passed under President Obama, but the Trump Administration turned those few sentences into hundreds of pages of regulations.
The No Surprises Act was passed with strong bipartisan congressional support, also under the Trump Administration, including provider requirements on good-faith estimates and advanced explanations of benefits.
Although the genesis of the No Surprises Act and the transparency requirements occurred under a Republican administration, upon taking over, it is striking that the Biden Administration did not challenge those regulations – as the Administration did on many other regulations passed under Trump. Biden actually doubled down on them, writing extensive and ongoing regulations and promising enforcement of the requirements.
Interoperability too is bipartisan, from its birth under the younger President Bush as Meaningful Use to the most recent requirements under Biden.
So, whatever happens in the congressional elections, the outcome will likely not impact the current torrent of regulations that healthcare is now facing.
But let’s talk about another political tool on the ballot that has and will continue to impact healthcare, and that is the ballot initiative (also called ballot measures, popular initiatives, or voter initiatives). About half the states allow ballot initiatives, which are intended to create, amend, or repeal a state law or constitutional amendment.
Proponents of ballot initiatives say that they are direct democracy in action, pushing for policy that state legislatures have not or will not deal with appropriately. Opponents say that ballot initiatives are actually a frontal attack on democracy that gives too much power to small-interest groups with big marketing budgets.
Even though there are fewer ballot initiatives this year than we saw in most of the last 20 elections, their impact on healthcare seems to be growing. In recent elections, we’ve seen ballot questions in multiple states that have changed state policy on marijuana and Medicaid expansion. This week, across the country, citizens in various states will be voting on 28 ballot measures related to abortion.
Other ballot initiatives that affect healthcare this week:
Massachusetts is asking voters to set an 83-percent medical loss ratio and add more regulations to dental plans.
Arizona’s Proposition 209 would reduce the maximum interest rates on consumer medical debt to 3 percent.
And a ballot initiative in Oregon would add an amendment to the state constitution stating that it is the obligation of the state to ensure that every citizen has affordable healthcare.
While it may be that a vote for one party or the other won’t impact healthcare, one way or the other, these ballot initiatives will have an impact.
Hope you all voted!
Programming note: Listen for live legislative reports every Monday on Monitor Mondays and sponsored by Zelis.
Hotly anticipated performance targets and payment amounts for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Advancing Chronic Care with Effective, Scalable Solutions (ACCESS) Model
I often begin my day with an environmental scan. Last week, an article from Becker’s Clinical Leadership caught my eye, “Hospital mortality, infectionrates improve despite
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
