Double-dipping has been seen among some Managed Care Organizations.
How many readers have undergone more than one audit? What about more than one audit for the same years or dates of service (DOS)?
Recently, I noticed that some auditors are doing what I would call “double dipping.” They are attempting to recoup monies twice for the same date of service for the same procedure and consumer.
Obviously, this is not allowed and it is easily defendable. But what if you never notice? This occurs especially with extrapolated audits. The universe of audited claims can be so large and encompass so many DOS that a provider may not catch the overlap. Plus, the audits may be from two different companies. Your attorneys or your statistical expert whom you hire to debunk the extrapolation can check for overlap as well.
Next, I want to discuss managed care organizations (MCO), which have become prevalent is about 40 states now. Capitated managed care is the dominant way in which states deliver services to Medicaid enrollees. These MCOs are generally private companies tasked to manage Medicaid dollars for their state. Supervision of their actions is limited or barren. Even though these MCOs may have their own contracts with providers, those contracts cannot circumvent federal law. Now when you sign these MCO contracts, you have no bargaining power.
While the federal regulations dictate that you should have all the appeal rights for adverse decisions that your state offers, many times these MCO contracts include arbitration clauses. An arbitration clause removes you from the appeal process owed to you and forces you to arbitrate, which is a much more expensive litigation route.
More and more, I am first fighting the arbitration clause in the contract just to follow the normal appeal process of whatever state we are in. Each state has an administrative law process, procedure, and administrative courts with judges. The administrative courts are the courts to “police” state agencies, including each state’s Medicaid agency, including the MCOs contracted with the state agency. The correct venue for provider Medicaid appeals is in administrative court, not arbitration.
The same is true for Medicare provider appeals; there is an administrative process for appeals. So why are these MCOs and MACs adding in arbitration clauses? While I do not know the reason for doing so, I can tell you that arbitration clauses cause the provider to pay more in litigation if they decide to arbitrate or fight the arbitration clause. It puts providers in between a rock and a hard place.
Check your contracts.
Programming note: Listen to healthcare attorney Knicole Emanuel’s RAC Report every Monday on Monitor Mondays, 10 Eastern.
H.R. 1 doesn’t directly rewrite ICD-10 or CPT, but it does change the environment in which you’re coding. The impact is mostly indirect – through
One of my favorite resources is Insights, distributed by Kodiak. Let me begin by noting that I do not have any affiliation with Kodiak. I
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24Â
