Audit Triggers from Medicare Cost Reports

EDITOR’S NOTE: The Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reported yesterday that Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance Corporation (WPS) did not properly settle for federal fiscal years (FYs) 2010 through 2012 Medicare cost reports submitted by inpatient hospitals in Missouri for Medicare disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments in accordance with federal requirements.

In reviewing a number of Medicare cost reports, I have some advice for why you may face added scrutiny and how to avoid it when possible.

Let’s start with acute care hospitals. After the advent of the prospective payment system (PPS) you may think audits do not matter.  Here are some standard and not so standard exceptions though.

Medicare continues to pay hospitals that treat a high number of poor patients an extra payment to offset the cost of caring for them.  These payments are called disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments. 

Surprisingly, instead of a few hospitals getting these payments, most hospitals in the U.S. receive some kind of DSH reimbursement. Hospitals that receive large DSH payments are routinely audited.  A specific focus is made during these audits on the number of Medicaid days for your facility.

First, you want to make sure that you are submitting a special bill to Medicare for all your Medicare Advantage patients. A part of the DSH payment computation uses the number of Medicare patient days for patients that became eligible when they qualified for Supplemental Security income, even when they are in a Medicare Advantage plan.

Hospitals with graduate medical education programs are usually good about these billings because they get paid for an extra payment from Medicare, but hospitals that get no extra payments are still required to bill.

You also want to make sure you can document the number of Medicaid patient days for your facility.  This is getting increasingly more difficult as many states have contracted out Medicaid to managed care companies. Denied claims from a Medicaid managed care plan can turn into a double whammy by reducing your Medicare DSH payments.

You also want to look at Schedule S-10 of your Medicare cost report for a potential audit risk.  That is because Medicare was supposed to eventually use the amount of “uncompensated care” in determining DSH reimbursement. You should look at this schedule and make sure it is filled out properly, both to reduce audit risk and make sure if it is used to compute DSH at a later date you do not lose reimbursement.

Speaking of graduate medical education, (GME) hospitals with large intern and resident programs are usually an audit target. Hospitals that have new programs or large swings in the number of residents can also expect audits.  Audits of GME payments can be very in depth and invasive. Make sure you have documented the time interns and residents spend in your facility and keep all the demographic information required by Medicare.

Hospitals are still cost reimbursed for Medicare bad debts. If there is a large swing in the amount of bad debts claimed on your cost report, you can expect an audit. You should also be aware of other regional issued that drive audits of bad debts. 

If your state has recently moved to managed Medicaid, Medicare auditors know you will struggle billing Medicaid for patients that are covered by both Medicare and Medicaid. Make sure your cost report preparer has made sure that your facility is properly billing Medicaid managed care companies for these “cross over” billings.

Let’s talk about skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). These facilities do not receive DSH or GME reimbursement, but they are cost reimbursed for bad debts and all the same comments I made above apply to their bad debts.

The single biggest cause of SNF audits, however, has to do with Schedule S-7 of the SNF cost report.  SNFs are paid a per diem payment falling into a specific resource utilization groups (RUGs).

Days of service for SNFs are broken out by RUG category on Schedule S-7. RUGs have a three-letter code.  If a SNF patient had physical, occupational or speech therapy on a given day, the pay code will start with an “R.” The second digit of the three digit shows how many minutes of therapy the patient received. “L” is for low, “M” is for “Medium”, “H” is for high, “V” is very high and “U” is for ultra-high services.  If a SNF shows most its claims are for ultra-high therapy services, it will greatly increase their audit risk.

What Can You Do?

Don’t live in fear. If your facility should receive a certain amount of reimbursement but it may raise an audit trigger.  Just prepare in advance. Make sure that for cost report entries that rely on the performance of billing functions, these billing functions are properly performed and documented. 

Make sure you keep your compliance officer and revenue cycle staff in the loop. It can all be a win win situation.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Timothy Powell, CPA, CHCP

Timothy Powell is a nationally recognized expert on regulatory matters, including the False Claims Act, Zone Program Integrity Contractor (ZPIC) audits, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) compliance. He is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and a national correspondent for Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Sepsis Sequencing in Focus: From Documentation to Defensible Coding

Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.

March 26, 2026
I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24