Planning is underway now for ICD-11.
The American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) has been getting involved in the development of ICD-11 through its participation in the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) activities, as well as providing members with high-level overviews of what to expect with the new classification system.
ICD-11 has yet to be approved by the World Health Assembly. This is expected to occur in May of this year. ICD-11 is not scheduled to go into effect until 2022, meaning that this is the earliest it will be available to implement. It is too early to know when ICD-11 will be implemented in the United States.
When the time comes, AHIMA will be well-positioned to lead ICD-11 advocacy efforts, support ICD-11 adoption and implementation, and provide education to coding professionals and other stakeholders.
Until then, AHIMA will continue our support for ICD-10-CM/PCS. A new coding productivity white paper was recently released. Coding productivity is an essential part of health information management operations focusing on high-quality, safe, and cost-effective healthcare.
Knowing that AHIMA needed to set the stage for a successful transition from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM/PCS, coding productivity benchmarking study was conducted in 2007. This study showed an average of 20 minutes were needed to code an inpatient record, making for a rate of approximately three records per hour.
With a relatively new classification system and laser-focused demands on the revenue cycle, AHIMA is working to create new coding productivity benchmarks going forward. To begin with, we are building on previous data captured.
The first post-ICD-10-CM/PCS coding productivity study was conducted in early 2016. This study examined average inpatient coding times within more than 150,000 medical records from large healthcare facilities. The authors of the study were able to validate that inpatient coding productivity immediately decreased upon the changeover to ICD-10-CM/PCS, but it gradually increased over the weeks immediately following the Oct. 1, 2015 go-live date. Productivity began at 42 minutes per inpatient record (or 1.4 records an hour) in October, and by the end of February 2016, it had improved to 40 minutes or 1.5 records per hour.
The second coding productivity study in the spring of 2016 found an ongoing increase in coding productivity over time as well. This second study evaluated more than 165,000 inpatient records and produced findings showing that inpatient coders required 38.1 minutes (on average) per record.
In addition, the second study found a positive correlation between an increased case mix index (CMI) and the amount of time needed to code an inpatient record. This is in direct correlation to today’s patients, who have increasingly complex health issues. While more data is needed to evaluate the impact on patient acuity levels, it is highly likely that they were responsible for some level of change in coding productivity in this study.
It’s important to put these findings as well as the 2007 benchmarking study results into context since healthcare has significantly changed and will continue to change over time.
The revenue cycle will continue to be a major focus for healthcare organizations as we move closer to quality and value-based care. Also, as more healthcare organizations implement computer-assisted coding technology, there will be some degree of coding productivity impact.
AHIMA is taking this opportunity to review professional development, certification offerings, and coder compensation benchmarking models to meet the future needs of our members and the industry. In addition, a comprehensive follow-up coding productivity study is underway, with results expected later this year.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The narrative in this article reflects the firsthand perspectives and professional experience of Tami McMasters Gomez, curated and prepared for publication by Penny
EDITOR’S NOTE: Ongoing discussion about U.S. disengagement from the World Health Organization (WHO), with withdrawal effective Jan. 22, has refocused attention on how global standards
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
