A Telehealth Tune-up under the PHE: Can You Survive an OIG Audit?

There has been a surge in telehealth fraud and abuse of more than $1 billion.

When the Public Health Emergency (PHE) was extended for the eighth time on Jan. 14, continuing the PHE through April 18, so were the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act flexibilities, under the 1135 waiver. This allows for virtual patient encounters to continue to be covered under Medicare when the patient is in their home when services are rendered.

However, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its Office of Inspector General (OIG) have seen a surge in telehealth fraud and abuse, to the tune of over $1 billion. This is why the Part B telehealth services landed on the OIG Work Plan in 2021, and the audits have expanded from seven target areas to nine. It is time to take inventory of how your practices are handing telehealth coding, billing, and reporting during the PHE. My rule of thumb is, “if the OIG is looking into it, you should be looking into it as well.”

Let’s look at the top 10 telehealth billing rules for FFS (fee for service) under the COVID-19 CARES Act, as listed on the CMS FAQ Sheet. A reminder that these are temporary, as long as the PHE is in effect:

  1. To bill an office visit code, 99202-99215, there must be both an audio and video connection with the patient (interactive two-way video);
  2. If there is no video connection during the patient encounter, the visit becomes a telephone call (code 99441-99443);
  3. The platform used must be listed/documented in the patient medical record, and if it is not a HIPAA-secured electronic medical record (EMR), but rather a smart-phone video chat app such as FaceTime or Skype, the patient needs to be informed that the link may not be secure;
  4. Consents need to be obtained once per year, and documented;
  5. If the video portion of the visit cuts out during the visit, make sure time is documented, because the visit now becomes a phone call code;
  6. Do not solicit patients for telehealth services;
  7. You can use either “time” or “MDM (medical decision-making)” to level your code;
  8. Physicians (MDs/DOs) and non-physician practitioners (NPPs, such as NPs, PAs and CNs) can report telehealth Services;
  9. Certain therapists can report their specific services under telehealth. Check the telehealth services list with CMS on which codes are approved; and
  10. A statement to confirm that the telehealth visit is to “slow or to stop the spread of COVID-19” should be reflected in the patient medical record to reflect “good faith,” and not only convenience.

Many practices did not adhere to the above rules and billed audio-only services incorrectly as office visits, and now may be under close scrutiny by the HHS and the OIG. The OIG has listed audio-only telehealth services on their 2021 Work Plan, so medical practices need to self-audit their telehealth services to make sure they can withstand a formal audit, if ever questioned.

Now, to update for 2022, behavioral health and mental health services will be permanently added to the telehealth services list once the PHE ends. A new audio-only phone call HCPCS code was added, G2252, to reflect an audio-only visit of 11-20 minutes when an in-person or virtual visit without video capabilities is not available to the provider or the patient. The audio-only phone call codes are slated to return to non-covered status when the PHE ends, and this was Medicare’s way of having an option for audio-only telehealth above and beyond the virtual check-in codes, G2012 and G2010.

Remember that the audio-only codes continue to have frequency and diagnosis rules to qualify for use.

HCPCS code G2252 is to be utilized for patients who do not have access to audio and video technology, and for “medical discussion…when the acuity of the patient’s problem is not necessarily likely to warrant a visit, but when the needs of the particular patient require more assessment time (11-20-minute discussion)” from the practitioner, differentiating it from G2012. Furthermore, these codes are used for established patients who have a relationship with the physician, and if the patient is scheduled for the soonest available appointment or comes to the clinic for an appointment within 24 hours, or was seen in the past seven days, this is not reported. Again, this is not valid until after the PHE ends.

The expansion of telehealth and the relaxation of the rules during PHE were considerable, but for the majority of it, it continues to be temporary. CMS does not have the authority to continue with the originating site being the patient’s home once the PHE ends, so Congress would have to step in and make that change. There are several bills addressing the permanent expansion of telehealth, and ICD10monitor will keep you updated as we receive regulatory updates.

Programming Note: For more information on this topic, listen to the live edition of  Talk Ten Tuesdays, when Terry Fletcher will discuss compliance issues surrounding telehealth and how to be proactive to make sure you can withstand an audit.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Terry A. Fletcher BS, CPC, CCC, CEMC, CCS, CCS-P, CMC, CMSCS, ACS-CA, SCP-CA, QMGC, QMCRC, QMPM

Terry Fletcher, BS, CPC, CCC, CEMC, CCS, CCS-P, CMC, CMSCS, CMCS, ACS-CA, SCP-CA, QMGC, QMCRC, is a healthcare coding consultant, educator, and auditor with more than 30 years of experience. Terry is a past member of the national advisory board for AAPC, past chair of the AAPCCA, and an AAPC national and regional conference educator. Terry is the author of several coding and reimbursement publications, as well as a practice auditor for multiple specialty practices around the country. Her coding and reimbursement specialties include cardiology, peripheral cardiology, gastroenterology, E&M auditing, orthopedics, general surgery, neurology, interventional radiology, and telehealth/telemedicine. Terry is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board and a popular panelist on Talk Ten Tuesdays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24