A recent executive order from President Donald J. Trump has introduced potential shifts in healthcare policy, raising questions about insurance coverage, medical coding, and compliance for hospitals and healthcare facilities.
On Jan. 28, the administration issued the “Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation” Executive Order, which blocks federal funding for gender-affirming care for individuals under 19. This includes puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and gender-related surgeries.
While the order does not ban these treatments outright, it prevents federally funded hospitals and clinics – including those accepting Medicare and Medicaid – from covering them. As a result, medical coders, billers, and compliance teams must navigate new challenges regarding insurance coverage, claim approvals, and documentation requirements.
The order was immediately challenged in court. On March 5, U.S. District Judge Brendan Hurson of Maryland issued a preliminary injunction, temporarily blocking the order’s enforcement while legal proceedings continue.
The lawsuit, filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Lambda Legal, and Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG) National, argued that the order disrupted necessary medical care and posed serious health risks to transgender youths.
The Court sided with the plaintiffs, citing potential negative impacts, including severe distress and heightened gender dysphoria; increased anxiety, depression, and suicide risk; uncertainty in accessing medical care; and fear of discrimination and hate crimes.
With the injunction, hospitals and clinics can continue providing gender-affirming care – for now. However, future policy shifts remain possible, as the case remains in the courts.
Medical coders must prepare for potential changes, even as the legal battle unfolds. If the executive order is upheld, coding for gender-affirming care could become more restrictive, requiring coders to be precise in their documentation to ensure accurate claims processing.
Clarifying medical necessity is one such challenge: hormone therapy is prescribed not only for gender transition, but also for menopause, early puberty, and endocrine disorders. Coders must justify the primary diagnosis to support claim approvals.Surgical coding distinctions is another challenge: procedures such as mastectomies for gender affirmation versus breast cancer treatment require clear documentation, as coverage will depend on the medical necessity.
Navigating insurance coverage is yet another consideration: Medicare and Medicaid may deny claims, while private or state-funded insurers may still approve them. Coders must track payor-specific policies carefully.
If the executive order is enforced, coders should expect heightened scrutiny, audits, and claim denials for gender-related procedures. To minimize risks, coders must ensure thorough documentation to meet compliance standards, monitor state laws (as some still mandate insurance coverage for gender-affirming care), and understand payor-specific policies, as private insurers may cover treatments that federal programs restrict.
With insurers implementing different policies, coders may face conflicting coverage decisions, where one payor denies a claim while another approves it. Staying informed on shifting regulations is critical to avoid delays and denials.
With the uncertainty surrounding enforcement, hospitals must invest in coder training to prevent billing errors, claim rejections, and compliance violations. Coders should work with compliance teams to ensure accurate documentation that aligns with evolving regulations, monitor updates from federal and private insurers to stay informed, request clear physician documentation (especially for cases where diagnosis codes have multiple interpretations), and remain proactive in understanding legal and policy shifts to anticipate changes in reimbursement and claim processing.
Now more than ever, medical coders play a vital role in healthcare institutions’ compliance and financial stability.
The Trump Administration’s executive order has introduced uncertainty into the funding and documentation of gender-affirming care. While a federal judge has temporarily blocked enforcement, the policy remains under review, leaving room for further developments.
Medical coders must remain proactive, adaptable, and well-informed to navigate these ongoing policy shifts and ensure billing accuracy and compliance.
Medical coders must stay updated on changing regulations. Accurate documentation is essential to secure claim approvals, and close collaboration with compliance teams is critical for avoiding errors and audits.
As legal challenges unfold, healthcare professionals must stay prepared for potential policy shifts, ensuring ethical medical practices and financial stability for providers and patients.
Hospitals should invest in coder training and compliance resources to navigate these policy changes effectively. Meanwhile, medical professionals and patients will watch closely as the legal case unfolds.
For now, gender-affirming care remains covered in federally funded institutions. However, how long that will remain the case is uncertain. The only certainty is that medical coders must be ready to adapt.
Programming note:
Listen live today when Penny Jefferson reports this story as the special guest during Talk Ten Tuesday with Chuck Buck at 10 am Eastern.
References
American Civil Liberties Union. (2025, March 5). Federal judge grants preliminary injunction against Trump’s anti-trans healthcare order. ACLU. https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/federal-judge-grants-preliminary-injunction-against-trumps-anti-trans-healthcare-order
Associated Press. (2025, March 5). Nationwide block extended on Trump’s executive order targeting transgender youth healthcare. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/293f3825495e23a5b7e7075c414dbffe
Kaiser Family Foundation. (2025, February 10). President Trump’s executive order on gender-affirming care: Responses by providers, states, and litigation. KFF. https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/president-trumps-executive-order-on-gender-affirming-care-responses-by-providers-states-and-litigation
New Yorker. (2025, February 20). Where do trans kids go from here?. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/where-do-trans-kids-go-from-here
Reuters. (2025, March 8). Families say Trump administration violates court order on youth gender treatments. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/families-say-trump-administration-violates-court-order-youth-gender-treatments-2025-03-08
The White House. (2025, January 28). Executive order on protecting children from chemical and surgical mutilation. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/protecting-children-from-chemical-and-surgical-mutilation
Here at MedLearn, we know cardiology coders are the unsung heroes of patient care. Every day, as a cardio coder you navigate complex cardiovascular procedures, including the constantly –changing CPT® and ICD-10-CM
EDITOR’S NOTE: Ongoing discussion about U.S. disengagement from the World Health Organization (WHO), with withdrawal effective Jan. 22, has refocused attention on how global standards
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
