The Dilemma Posed by Private Equity in Healthcare

Some recent high-profile cases clearly demonstrate neglect, fraud, and abuse.

While not new, private equity (PE) interests are buying hospitals and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) at an increasing pace. Many of the purchasers are physician organizations, and members of Congress are sounding a doomsday alarm about profits being prioritized ahead of patients. Some recent high-profile cases clearly demonstrate neglect, fraud, and abuse. This, however, is not a situation unique to PE ownership.

Nearly all nursing homes are already privately owned. Why the concern about PE ownership? Isn’t it all the same? Excellent question. The answer is more complex than simply one of ownership.

Businesses exist to return a profit, based on earnings from operations. Successful businesses also desire to serve the community. Like most businesses, nursing home owners are in it for the long haul. Apart from Silicon Valley, where every startup hopes to be bought out by a larger concern, with an eye on ultimately figuring out what to do with billions in cash and equities, most people start businesses for something more mundane: making a living. 

Enter PE. The expectation of PE interests is a 30-percent return on investment (ROI). With razor-thin margins, nursing homes and hospitals would appear to be suboptimal opportunities. If that 30 percent were expected to come from operational revenue, indeed, it would be a fool’s errand to invest. Or criminal activity would be involved. So, from where does this kind of ROI come? It’s not all bad.

The basic supposition is that most healthcare organizations, whether a single nursing home or an entire hospital system, are rife with inefficiency. Higher earnings can be extracted through efficiencies. It is hard to argue with that. Even not-for-profits (or maybe especially not-for-profits) have layers of ineffectiveness and inefficiencies, lacking accountability to investors. It’s hard to argue against accountability. We’ve all seen it. Absolutely gorgeous buildings with courtyards and artwork, all found at the not-for-profits. The money comes from more than the savings of operating tax-free. I’m just getting started. Increased earnings can be extracted by leadership having accountability to a real board of directors, not one person chosen by leadership. 

Ultimately, the big ROI does not come from earnings (not that earnings don’t factor heavily into the equation). It comes from either selling part or all of the now-successful business, or from add-on businesses that enhance and expand on the core business. I worked for a system that exemplified all of the above. 

Part of a “360” facility system, mine was one of the larger nursing homes, with 220 beds and a thriving sub-acute unit. “Sun,” as the corporation was nicknamed, bought nursing homes in financial difficulties, often nonprofits. Mine was acquired from a Jewish charity. Sun bought the business, building and all, and put quite a lot into rehabbing it, and it was then in turn sold to a management company controlled by – you guessed it – Sun. The facility got the tax leverage of being lessees. The management company was able to turn a nice profit without adding to the tax liability of the whole. Not only is this legal, it is also good business. Then came the add-ons.

Sun created a separate corporation offering physical, occupational, and speech therapy services to the Sun buildings. Was this legal? Yes. The therapy company provided services to many non-Sun facilities. Then came “Sun Scripts,” a pharmacy network that served Sun buildings. Now, surely this is not OK, right? It’s quite OK. Sun facilities were free to go to other pharmacies, which I did frequently with our managed care residents, for better prices. Then came SunQuest, a consulting company. It was designed to bring a level of revenue cycle expertise to facilities’ administrators, eventually taking on non-Sun clients. This new corporation did not pan out as planned, so it closed and everyone was let go. 

If I sound like a fan of PEs, let’s leave it as that I am not opposed to them. There are downsides. PEs may not have the connections to a community that home-grown businesses have. PEs are also perceived as having less of a connection to their employees. PEs live to challenge the competition. God knows I enjoyed my share of schadenfreude, as competitors struggled as we succeeded. But we, at the end of the day, had a heart for what we did; it was all we did. 

If you are looking for a downside, consider this. I took over a nursing home with an empty checking account and a business office manager who had not submitted a claim, because the lease had not been paid on the coding and billing platforms. Payroll was due in two weeks. A cash call went out to the founding investors, and payroll was met for the next month. But I needed more cash – and a lot of it. I was introduced to venture capitalist. I asked for $1.5 million. He said yes, for a 51-percent stake, and I had to agree to stay on. I knew the owner would say no, and to my slight regret, I felt the same. It would have been a fun ride, pulling things together. However, it would have put the owner, a person who had put heart and soul into this enterprise, a person with roots in the community, in a minority position. Instead, she quickly married into money, saving the business. If there’s a moral to that story, someone let me know.    

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Marvin D. Mitchell, RN, BSN, MBA

Marvin D. Mitchell, RN, BSN, MBA, is the director of case management and social work at San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, east of Los Angeles. Building programs from the ground up has been his passion in every venue where case management is practiced. Mitchell is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and makes frequent appearances on Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24