Clinical documentation integrity (CDI) is more important than ever, in the age of COVID-19.
I have been hearing grumbles on TV and in social media that the diagnosis of COVID-19 in some patients who are being counted as COVID-19 patients overwhelming the nation’s hospital systems is not really legitimate.
The implication is that unless the condition is the principal diagnosis, it shouldn’t count. Really? Is it a phantom PCR test, pretend personal protective equipment, fake ventilation needs in an isolation room on a COVID-19 ward? Does the room turnover not require the same time-consuming terminal cleaning? Do precautions not need to be taken to prevent those patients from spreading virus to other patients?
If it is a secondary diagnosis, is it truly incidental (e.g., not impacting the patient at all, like they are asymptomatic), or is it causing the admission secondhandedly? How can we tell?!
Clinical documentation integrity (CDI) is more important than ever, in the age of COVID-19. It is critical that we ensure that providers are documenting accurately, and that coders are picking up the right codes in the correct sequence.
There are actually five buckets of COVID-19-related patients in our hospitals now. There are patients admitted:
Coders need to remember that uncertain diagnoses of COVID-19 are not coded as U07.1. Everyone else needs to remember that coders are permitted to assign U07.1 if a positive COVID-19 test result has been obtained, even if no one documented it.
Are the statistics correct? I am seeing quoted 40-percent “incidental” COVID. Is the sequencing accurate? Are the POA indicators correct? Is it really incidental?
The most important relevant Official Guideline is I. C. 1. g. 1) (b) Sequencing of codes (of COVID-19). The first part of the first sentence says, “when COVID-19 meets the definition of principal diagnosis.” This invokes Section II, which deals with the selection of principal diagnosis (PDx), as long as the Tabular List and Alphabetic List don’t contradict the guidelines. People are misinterpreting the guidelines and placing undue emphasis on the second phrase, which continues, “U07.1, COVID-19 should be sequenced first.”
When does a condition meet the definition of PDx? The PDx is the “condition which is established, after study, to be chiefly responsible for occasioning the admission of the patient to the hospital for care.” It is present on admission. It typically consumes the lion’s share of the resources. The only bucket above that meets these criteria is Bucket No. 1. Only in active infections is U07.1 PDx.
The Guidelines overtly advise following sepsis guidelines if COVID-19 has progressed to sepsis. If the patient is obstetric or neonatal, those guidelines take precedence. If there is a lung transplant recipient with COVID-19 pneumonia, the T86 code indicating infection of lung transplant would be PDx.
There are two small wrinkles relative to this issue. The first is the 20-percent increase in the Medicare Severity DRG, which is applied if there is a positive COVID-19 laboratory test. Some people may think that incidental COVID-19 is not entitled to the upward adjustment. There are precautions and actions taken just on the basis of being infected with SARS-CoV-2 that justify this adjustment. I cannot imagine a situation currently, during the Omicron/Delta surge, which would negate COVID-19 meeting legitimate secondary diagnosis criteria.
The second issue is the sequencing instruction by the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) for eligibility for the COVID-19 Uninsured Program. Patients who are uninsured are covered by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 through the Provider Relief Fund. The guidance by HRSA for claims reimbursement submission is that U07.1 must be listed as the primary diagnosis. Paraphrased, HRSA recognizes that using COVID-19 as primary diagnosis is contrary to the Official Coding Guidelines; however, HRSA’s COVID-19 Uninsured Program is not a health plan, so it is not subject to HIPAA requirements.
Does this make it look like the healthcare establishment is gaming the system? The government makes the rules; hospitals are just trying to follow them to get paid appropriately.
Nosocomial COVID-19 could be ascertained by analyzing the POA indicator. That might be an important quality measure to determine and monitor.
How could we tease out incidental from an additional compounding diagnosis? Without chart review, I would recommend compiling a list of diagnoses that could probably be exacerbated or initiated by the presence of a COVID-19 infection. They are likely to be cardiac or pulmonary in etiology, but not exclusively. If one of those (e.g., exacerbation of COPD, acute on chronic heart failure) is PDx and COVID-19 is a secondary diagnosis, the virus is a comorbidity, not incidental. Incidental COVID-19 is also likely to be asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic, as opposed to having genuine manifestations.
This will miss some cases. For instance, say an elderly patient who has COVID-19 and has been weak gets dehydrated and falls, fracturing his hip. Is his hip fracture sequenced PDx to correspond with the principal procedure, or is his PDx COVID-19 because it is the reason for occasioning the admission?
Does it really matter? The public isn’t likely to be savvy enough to understand the nuanced difference between comorbid and incidental if they can’t comprehend that an mRNA vaccine doesn’t alter a person’s DNA. Hospitals are busting at the seams with COVID-19 patients, patients with something else caused by COVID-19, patients with something else who just happen to be COVID-19-positive, and a couple of patients who don’t have COVID-19, now or yet.
An absurdly high positivity rate indicates there is a variant of crazy transmissibility that is ravaging our population. Incidental, schmincidental; isn’t that bad enough?!
Programming Note: Listen to Dr. Erica Remer today as she co-hosts Talk Ten Tuesdays with Chuck Buck at 10 am Eastern.
Here at MedLearn, we know cardiology coders are the unsung heroes of patient care. Every day, as a cardio coder you navigate complex cardiovascular procedures, including the constantly –changing CPT® and ICD-10-CM
Today, we are continuing our January look at 2026 CPT code updates. As a reminder there were 5,933 new CPT codes with the January 1
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
