In my view, the latest change to this guideline is the best so far.
The current definition of the root operation Control is “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural or other acute bleeding.”
Since the implementation of ICD-10-PCS on Oct. 1, 2015, this definition and associated guideline have undergone several revisions. Effective with discharges on and after Oct. 1, 2021, guideline B3.7, Control vs. more specific root operations, is being tweaked yet again. Before delving into what’s new, let’s take a walk down memory lane and see how we got here.
The first change came in fiscal year 2017, and significantly altered how we code for hemorrhage control. The original intent of this root operation was to stop or attempt to stop postprocedural bleeding. In 2017, the definition was expanded to include control of either postprocedural or other acute bleeding, and the guideline was updated to reflect this change. The original guideline went on to state that if an attempt to stop the bleeding is initially unsuccessful and any of the definitive root operations of Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection are performed, that definitive root operation is coded instead.
Differences between the versions are highlighted in bold:
|
FY 2016 |
FY 2017 |
|
B3.7 Control vs. more definitive root operations The root operation Control is defined as “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural bleeding.” If an attempt to stop postprocedural bleeding is initially unsuccessful, and to stop the bleeding requires performing any of the definitive root operations Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection, then that root operation is coded instead of Control. Example: Resection of spleen to stop postprocedural bleeding is coded to Resection instead of Control. |
B3.7 Control vs. more definitive root operations The root operation Control is defined as “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural or other acute bleeding.” If an attempt to stop postprocedural or other acute bleeding is initially unsuccessful, and to stop the bleeding requires performing any of the definitive root operations Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection, then that root operation is coded instead of Control. Example: Resection of spleen to stop bleeding is coded to Resection instead of Control. |
In 2018, what looked like a minor change to the guidelines made another big change to how we code. The addition of the words “such as” indicated this list was not all inclusive, and there could be other root operations used to control bleeding outside of those listed in the guideline. For example, I remember seeing discussion boards around this time discussing the appropriate root operation to use for embolization of an arterial bleed for treatment of a bleeding stomach ulcer. Embolization in this situation is coded as Occlusion, but it’s not on that list.
|
FY 2017 |
FY 2018 |
|
B3.7 Control vs. more definitive root operations The root operation Control is defined as “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural or other acute bleeding.” If an attempt to stop postprocedural or other acute bleeding is initially unsuccessful, and to stop the bleeding requires performing any of the definitive root operations Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection, then that root operation is coded instead of Control. Example: Resection of spleen to stop bleeding is coded to Resection instead of Control. |
B3.7 Control vs. more definitive root operations The root operation Control is defined as “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural or other acute bleeding.” If an attempt to stop postprocedural or other acute bleeding is initially unsuccessful, and to stop the bleeding requires performing a more definitive root operation, such as Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection, then the more definitive root operation is coded instead of Control. Example: Resection of spleen to stop bleeding is coded to Resection instead of Control. |
The 2018 guideline change also left another questionable word in the definition: “initially.” The use of this root operation was supposed to be a secondary attempt to achieve hemostasis, but that was also causing coder confusion. What constitutes an initial unsuccessful attempt? So, in the following year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) removed that word.
|
FY 2019 |
|
B3.7 Control vs. more definitive root operations The root operation Control is defined as “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural or other acute bleeding.” If an attempt to stop postprocedural or other acute bleeding is initially unsuccessful, and to stop the bleeding requires performing a more definitive root operation, such as Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection, then the more definitive root operation is coded instead of Control. Example: Resection of spleen to stop bleeding is coded to Resection instead of Control. |
In my view, the latest change to this guideline is the best so far. First off, the guideline title is being changed from “Control vs. more definitive root operations” to “Control vs. more specific root operations.” Second, it specifies that this root operation is to be used when the procedure performed to control bleeding is above and beyond normal hemostasis measures considered integral to the primary surgical procedure. Third, it adds language clarifying the use of a more specific root operation rather than Control. And finally, three distinct examples are given to show when the root operation Control is used, when a more specific root operation is used, and when no additional code is necessary.
|
FY 2022 |
|
B3.7 Control vs. more specific root operations The root operation Control is defined as “stopping, or attempting to stop, postprocedural or other acute bleeding.” Control is the root operation coded when the procedure performed to achieve hemostasis, beyond what would be considered integral to a procedure, utilizes techniques (e.g. cautery, application of substances or pressure, suturing or ligation or clipping of bleeding points at the site) that are not described by a more specific root operation definition, such as Bypass, Detachment, Excision, Extraction, Reposition, Replacement, or Resection. If a more specific root operation definition applies to the procedure performed, then the more specific root operation is coded instead of Control. Example: Silver nitrate cautery to treat acute nasal bleeding is coded to the root operation Control. Example: Liquid embolization of the right internal iliac artery to treat acute hematoma by stopping blood flow is coded to the root operation Occlusion. Example: Suctioning of residual blood to achieve hemostasis during a transbronchial cryobiopsy is considered integral to the cryobiopsy procedure and is not coded separately. |
If you’ve been struggling to unpack coding guidance for control of postoperative or acute bleeding, this is your year! It’s frustrating that it sometimes takes several years to get a coding guideline “right,” but I think they’ve finally done it.
As coders, we are familiar with the ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance (C&M) Committee. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) describes it as a
Coding in the post-acute care world has taken on a new significance in the past five years. For those of us who are coders, this
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
This first session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature an in-depth explanation of FY26 changes to ICD-10-CM codes and guidelines, CCs/MCCs, and revisions to the MCE, presented by presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.
Bring your questions and join the conversation during this open forum series, live every Wednesday at 10 a.m. EST from June 11–July 30. Hosted by Chuck Buck, these fast-paced 30-minute sessions connect you directly with top healthcare experts tackling today’s most urgent compliance and policy issues.
Fraud convictions don’t just punish a few bad claims; they can wipe out years of reimbursements. Don’t wait for an audit to learn the rules. Join Frank Cohen, MPA, for a live Q&A on spotting red flags, avoiding liability, and protecting your practice. Register now and bring your questions!
Substance abuse is everywhere. It’s a complicated diagnosis with wide-ranging implications well beyond acute care. The face of addiction continues to change so it’s important to remember not just the addict but the spectrum of extended victims and the other social determinants and legal ramifications. Join John K. Hall, MD, JD, MBA, FCLM, FRCPC, for a critical Q&A on navigating substance abuse in 2025. Register today and be a part of the conversation!
Copyright © 2025 ICD10monitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
