CMS reached its final judgment on coverage for FDA-approved monoclonal antibodies. These antibodies are used against amyloid for the purposes of Alzheimer’s disease treatment. The service occurs under Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) in FDA-approved, CMS-approved, or NIH-sponsored controlled trials with the national coverage determination (NCD) originally proposed in January. To the great disappointment of advocates, CMS finalized the decision to include no additional coverage for beta-amyloid PET scans. Even more, the PET scans will remain under the present policy, which contains massive restrictions including providing coverage only when meeting requirements for clinical trial protocol. Another striking aspect is the reality that the restriction imposed is limited to only one per patient per lifetime. The decision by CMS is a blow to the many groups including radiology stakeholders like the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) who have put forth effort into Alzheimer’s disease advocacy, promoting sharp comments in rebuke.
Alzheimer’s remains a massive threat to healthcare and public health. According to the Alzheimer’s Association, one in three seniors dies of this disease or a related dementia, with over 6 million Americans living with the disease presently. This number is projected to skyrocket to 13 million by 2050. Even more, the COVID-19 pandemic has given fuel to the fire, with the association stating, “In 2020, COVID-19 contributed to a 17% increase in Alzheimer’s and dementia deaths.” The staggering cost in 2022 is expected to reach $321 billion nationwide for healthcare related to this disease and other dementias. This unfortunately is only one slope of the economic avalanche, with an estimated 11 million Americans providing unpaid care, and “In 2021, these caregivers provided more than 16 billion hours of care valued at nearly $272 billion.”
The implications of Alzheimer’s and related dementias to healthcare are alarming, creating an imperative for advocacy related to the disease such as the future of amyloid PET. Understandably, any decision made by CMS related to this topic will be met with backlash and controversy.
SNMMI made several points in an online statement last month in regard to the decision. One of the surprises that SNMMI notes about the decision is that “In stark contrast, the decision explicitly covers other tests for detection of beta amyloid (e.g., cerebral spinal fluid) without limitation, despite the fact that beta-amyloid PET is the standard of care—and, in fact, the only test approved by the FDA—for detecting beta amyloid.”
SNMMI had rallied for the coverage of beta-amyloid PET scans, previously sending detailed arguments in multiple letters to CMS, expressing the advantages, especially in contrast against the use of cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers, to guarantee correct and timely Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis.
The society notes that at present beta-amyloid PET is the only biomarker with FDA approval with the objective of detecting beta-amyloid plaque, and the only one available for detection of beta-amyloid plaque in the brain. As SNMMI explained at length in their previous letters, “There is no evidence to suggest that a single amyloid PET scan per patient is appropriate or that a scan performed years ago can provide the diagnostic information needed to determine whether a patient is currently a candidate for therapy. CMS should allow as many PET scans as are needed to ensure that any trial design is optimal and reliable and provides physicians with the information they need to make informed decisions about initiating and continuing therapy.”
Stakeholders also took note of the silence surrounding the removal or retirement of the beta-amyloid PET NCD. Pre-trial beta-amyloid PET scans are the hallmark for the identification of amyloid plague in the brain. Pre-trial beta-amyloid scans are a tool for weeding out any patients who may not obtain benefit from monoclonal antibody treatment, “sparing them the stress and anxiety of participating in a clinical trial for a product that will not be beneficial as well as the potential negative effects of drug-related toxicities.”
Another point of contention surrounds the failure to remove the CED requirement since it would have been timed with the approval of both aducanumab and the coverage of tau PET diagnostics which were approved on January 1. Acting on this recommendation would have aided in keeping fair access to the new therapy. Furthermore, SNMMI points out that “It is ironic that patients now have access to a potentially unlimited number of tau PET scans but are limited to only one amyloid PET scan, and, even then, only as part of a clinical trial. Further, access will be limited by current CMS rules that systematically under-reimburse for amyloid PET scans due to bundling in the outpatient hospital setting.”
One point that was welcome by the society and other stakeholders was the fact that CMS took time to clarify requirements associated with a qualifying randomized controlled trial and the understanding that CMS has decided not to put limits or restrictions regarding the location of service in the final NCD.
The society stresses that it will continue to scrutinize the final NCD and keep members in the loop in regard to any continued conversations with CMS. Although SNMMI was disappointed in the lack of further coverage inclusion for amyloid PET scans, the society did acknowledge the reality that in terms of monoclonal antibodies, “CMS’s final decision to cover monoclonal antibodies that have been FDA approved based on clinical efficacy rather than surrogate biomarkers—and as part of a registry rather than a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial—is a step forward.” For amyloid PET, the fight is not over. SNMMI reassured its members that it will advocate, striving to obtain “broad national coverage of amyloid PET scans by either a positive NCD or through Medicare Administrative Contractor discretion.”
Information Sources:
http://www.snmmi.org/newspublications/NewsDetail.aspx?ItemNumber=40305
We all lost an hour of sleep when we “sprang forward” this past weekend. This week is National Sleep Awareness Week for 2026. In its 28th
EDITOR’S NOTE: Artificial intelligence was utilized for structural refinement and grammatical editing. All analyses, interpretations, and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
