Well, by now I am sure all of you have had plenty of time to read the 1,657 pages of the Outpatient Final Rule, so there is no need for me to discuss it any further. I will note that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) finally posted the actual Inpatient-Only List and the new Addendum B, and I have posted both of those, along with a list of all the surgeries removed from the Inpatient-Only List, on my inpatient-only webpage at www.ronaldhirsch.com.
I have also mentioned that CMS has greatly expanded the number of procedures that can be done at ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), as of Jan. 1, and as you may recall, a Medicare patient having a procedure at an ASC who does not have a Medicare supplement, which accounts for about 11 percent of beneficiaries, owes 20 percent of the approved payment. And unlike outpatient services at a hospital, where there is a statutory limit in the patient’s financial obligation, equal to the Part A deductible, which for 2026 is $1,736, there is no such limit for ASC procedures.
That means for 252 procedures, patients without a supplement will pay more at an ASC than at a hospital, with an out-of-pocket cost that averages about $3,000, but can go as high as almost $8,500.
What was the CMS response when I pointed that out? They noted that they have an online tool that patients can use to see an estimate of their costs. But I would bet that if they checked the number of times that a Medicare beneficiary used that tool, it would be miniscule. Well, at least I can say I tried.
Also, as a reminder, if a patient has an outpatient procedure at a hospital and has a delayed recovery or complication, they can be kept as outpatient or admitted as inpatient for that additional care. But if something happens in an ASC, the ASC will simply be picking up a phone and calling 911, shifting the responsibility of the care to the hospital and hospital-based physicians.
It is also worth noting that the payment for observation for 2026 is increasing, with the base payment increasing by a huge $24.42. In addition, the payment for an outpatient total joint will increase by $250, a 1.9-percent increase, which, of course, is less than the rate of inflation.
So, all you orthopedic case managers can forget about a raise in 2026.
And, as some might remember, when CMS first attempted to eliminate the Inpatient-Only List, one of the big complaints was that the payment rates for the surgeries as outpatient was far below the actual costs – so this time, CMS took great care in assigning payment rates, and even established a seventh APC for very high-cost orthopedic, spine, and neurosurgery procedures. That should make this transition a bit less financially painful.
I will also note that CMS has released another proposed rule for Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. And among the noteworthy items I saw were that CMS is proposing to remove from the Star Rating system measures of the timeliness of appeal decisions, complaints about customer service, and complaints about the health plans themselves.
Even though these will be removed, it is still important to urge your MA patients to file complaints with CMS when their MA plan deprives them of medically necessary care.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) operates a surveillance platform called the Fraud Prevention System (FPS) that analyzes Medicare claims across the full
EDITOR’S NOTE: Artificial intelligence was utilized for structural refinement and grammatical editing. All analyses, interpretations, and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
