It’s two weeks into November, and still no Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Final Rule from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
Now, will the implementation date be pushed back, since federal law mandates a 60-day period between publication in the Federal Register and the rule going into effect? Who knows what will happen.
But as we wait, there is other news.
First, Aetna has delayed the start date for their very unpopular and very immoral (yet sadly legal) plan to pay inpatient admissions that do not meet MCG inpatient criteria at a lower, observation-like rate. They pushed back the start date to Jan. 1 and will not apply MCG criteria to inpatient admissions of five or more days, instead paying them at the contracted inpatient rate.
But this does not mean your finance team should not continue to push back on this. You know the other payors are watching Aetna’s actions and likely running the numbers, deciding if and when to adopt this as their payment policy.
Next, CMS named the companies that got the contracts to participate in the Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction (WISeR) prior authorization demonstration project. There are six companies, and I will admit there is only one whose name is vaguely familiar to me, even though the websites of all six indicate they work in healthcare using artificial intelligence (AI).
But the program proceeding is not a sure thing, as on Friday, six members of the House of Representatives introduced a bill to prohibit CMS from implementing WISeR or any similar program. I doubt this bill will be getting a vote anytime soon, so affected providers should plan for Jan. 1. Yet even with contractors named, so far not one of the companies has any information on their website about how requests should be submitted. More watching and waiting.
I can also report that there is not yet any sign of the new Important Message from Medicare (IMM) or Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice (MOON) to replace the versions that are expiring very soon. I have sent requests for updates, but there is silence from CMS. I sent another email to CMS on an unrelated issue, and the automatic response was “we will respond as soon as possible once communications are permitted.”
Is CMS leadership actually preventing staff from communicating with providers? That’s really sad, if true. As there is talk of a settlement in the shutdown, we can only hope that release of these new forms is on the “to-do immediately” list, along with release of the OPPS Rule.
I will note that in the past, when forms expired, they allowed the use of the expired form until the new forms were released, and then there was a grace period. I have also seen the proposed changes to the MOON, and while the content is similar, the design is markedly different.
Finally, some of you may know that Maximus, the contractor that acts as the Qualified Independent Contractor (QIC) for Medicare, reviewing second-level appeals for Medicare Advantage (MA), has published their latest findings. And their data from 2025 is rather depressing.
For denied inpatient admissions, they approved 10 percent. For patients appealing to get access to inpatient rehabilitation, they approved 1 percent, and for Long-Term Acute-Care Hospitals LTACHs, they only approved two of the 2,680 appeals filed.
But there is always a bright spot. And here it was a reversal of a Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) downgrade of sepsis, wherein the MA plan claimed they downgraded the DRG of sepsis to urinary tract infection (UTI), as the documentation did not support the diagnosis of sepsis, but at the same time they told Maximus that they did not have any medical records to forward to them, and that they never even requested the records from the provider. Maximus gave them an earful for playing those games. Sadly, they did not name the MA plan, perhaps to spare them the ridicule you know they would get from me.
The lesson here is that if you are getting DRG downgrades, your first check should be to ensure that the payer actually requested the medical records. If they are removing diagnoses as invalid without even reviewing records, their behavior needs to be called out, preferably publicly, and to your state insurance commission.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
As the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) clarifies existing Medicare policies like the Two-Midnight Rule, which guides the appropriateness of inpatient services, some
Today we’re talking about a major shift in Medicare rules that’s going to impact hospitals, surgeons, and physician advisors alike: the phasing out of the
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
