I have two topics to cover today. First, let me start with criticism of an article I read wherein a healthcare executive was interviewed about reducing readmissions. This person said that to reduce readmissions, hospitals need to follow standards for length of stay. They then go on to discuss using the recommended length of stay, noting that exceeding it poses risks for patients, including falls, medication errors, and hospital-acquired infections.
I have never seen a table of recommended lengths of stay, so I have to presume they are referring to the geometric mean length of stay (GMLOS). And in no way should the GMLOS be considered the recommended length of stay. For Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) 872, sepsis with a major complication or comorbidity (MCC), the GMLOS is 4.9 days. Are they suggesting that every such patient is recommended to be discharged on day 5, even if they are still encephalopathic, on pressors, and their creatinine is rising?
Please do not use the GMLOS as the right length of stay for every DRG. The right length of stay is when every day of their stay is a medically necessary hospital day.
On the positive side, to reduce readmissions, the article did recommend ensuring that patients can get their medications on discharge, have a follow-up appointment, and know who to call if there are questions or issues, to avoid having to go back to the hospital. Now, why didn’t we all think of those things?
Next, as we have mentioned in the past, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is transitioning the short-stay audits to the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) under their Targeted Probe-and-Educate (TPE) program, and they released a FAQ last week. As expected, I have some concerns. First, CMS refers to MCG Care Guidelines as “Milliman.” It has been called MCG since 2012. Perhaps we should start calling CMS with its old acronym, HCFA.
More significantly, they state that the MAC staff will not be using MCG or InterQual to make determinations, but clinical judgement. Whether “will not” is the same as “may not” is not clear, but suggestive of a prohibition. But the FAQ states that reviews will be performed by nurses with physician backup only for complex cases.
Now, I will defer to my nursing and legal colleagues, but I was under the impression that nursing licensure does not allow registered nurses (RNs) to make decisions based on their clinical judgement. Commercial criteria are a very helpful tool when used properly, and allowing nurses to use them for case screening (but not as a definitive reason for denial) is sensible. It remains to be seen how the MACs actually perform reviews; we will all be watching closely.
It is also interesting and concerning to note that under the current process, if Livanta intended to deny a short inpatient admission, you had an opportunity to discuss the case with them prior to an official denial being issued. Under TPE, if there are denied cases, you will be offered an education session from the MAC, but will have to formally appeal every denied admission, even if the MAC missed that the care began before midnight or the surgery was in fact on the Inpatient-Only List. Creating more work for providers is not something that anyone will be looking forward to.
In addition, in the CMS announcement, they once again confuse the need for inpatient admission and the need for hospital care. We all know that the basis of the rule is the determination that the patient is expected to require two midnight of necessary hospital care, yet the FAQ states they expect documentation to “support the need for services to be provided in an inpatient hospital setting.” There is absolutely no service that “needs the inpatient hospital setting.” Many services must be performed in a hospital for safety and regulatory reasons, but no hospital differentiates the medical care provided to inpatients and outpatients in the hospital. I certainly hope CMS clarifies that prior to the start of the audits.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
Healthcare has been transitioning toward a more digital, interconnected ecosystem for many years, but the pace and magnitude of current changes represent a fundamental shift.
Has anyone asked you to remember a short list of words, in this case certain nouns? Well, recently, my husband and I were reading some
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
