While we’ve obviously got some big news coming out of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), today I wanted to give you an update on a couple other big issues from the President’s desk and Capitol Hill.
President Trump signed an executive order (EO) last week aiming to support price transparency surrounding healthcare costs by reinforcing a transparency rule from his first term.
This new EO requires the departments of the Treasury, Labor, and HHS to “rapidly implement and enforce” a 2019 Trump EO on price and quality transparency. Frequent readers may recall that this 2019 EO requires hospitals to publicly post standard charge information in a machine-readable format. Included in the new 2025 Trump EO is a directive to the agencies to develop a regulatory framework within the next 90 days to ensure the disclosure of actual prices of items and services (rather than estimates), issue updated guidance that ensures standardized and comparable pricing info across entities, and update enforcement policies.
Hospitals have reportedly been slow to comply with federal transparency rules. The latest study by Patient Rights Advocate.org found that only 21.1 percent of hospitals they reviewed were fully in compliance – actually marking a steep decline from the previous report, in which almost 35 percent of hospitals were in compliance.
Hospital representatives have stated that this is often due to staffing issues and confusion regarding explicit requirements. But with President Trump’s renewed attention on the issue, it could soon become a priority for the administration – and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), as the agency has said it is planning more systematic monitoring and enforcement pursuant to the EO.
This could interact interestingly, however, with an EO the Trump Administration passed in January that states that for every new agency rule, regulation, or guidance, it must identify at least 10 existing documents to be repealed in order to promote the goal of its “regulatory reduction effort.” It is not clear if the departments implicated in the new transparency EO will comply with this “10-Out, 1-In” order, or if so, what rules and regulations they would cut in place of new transparency requirements.
Turning to Congress, they are currently in a stalemate after both chambers passed competing budget measures, and top members on both sides say they won’t accept the other chamber’s version. The Senate adopted a $340 billion budget resolution earlier in February, while the House passed its own version last week that was much broader.
President Trump has signaled his support for the House version, as it contains more items from his agenda than the Senate’s version, but both chambers must vote on the same budget resolution before they can formally draft a bill that can make it through the entire legislative process without issue or interference.
As my colleague Matthew Albright reported last week, the House budget resolution charged the House Energy and Commerce Committee with cutting $880 billion from the programs of which it is in charge. Medicaid and Medicare are under the purview of this committee, and although Trump has said he will not make cuts to Medicare, Medicaid has not gotten the same promised protection. House Speaker Johnson has said that Medicaid is “hugely problematic” because of fraud, waste, and abuse, and Trump has given conflicting statements about its future. However, after the House resolution passed, Speaker Johnson went on record promising that the cuts would not come from policies directly impacting people’s Medicaid benefits or a change to the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage: the formula used to determine the federal government’s share of Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) costs for each individual state.
These competing budget resolutions are also arising amid the looming partial government shutdown on March 14, and Speaker Johnson has stated that a stopgap measure holding federal funds at current levels is “becoming inevitable at this point,” given the fact that at least some Democrat votes would be needed on spending bills, and there is reportedly a tense dynamic over these bills, even among the GOP.
Healthcare has been transitioning toward a more digital, interconnected ecosystem for many years, but the pace and magnitude of current changes represent a fundamental shift.
Has anyone asked you to remember a short list of words, in this case certain nouns? Well, recently, my husband and I were reading some
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
