The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the review copy of the Fee Schedule, Friday, Nov. 1. Usually, the final copy appears about three weeks after the review copy, but for some reason there’s a long delay this year, with the Federal Register version set to appear on Dec. 9.
One good thing in the Final Rule is that CMS continues to permit physicians using telehealth from their home to use their office address, rather than their home address, on claims. For reasons I don’t understand, CMS is calling this permission a “temporary extension” through the end of 2025.
One reason that puzzles me is that I am not aware of any statute or regulation that would suggest the physician’s home needs to appear on the claim. As we’ve discussed before, Medicare regulations don’t specify where a service has occurred. If the patient is in Sacramento while the physician is in Los Angeles, where did the service occur? I would argue that it’s the patient’s location of Sacramento. Given the regulatory silence, I don’t think the Fee Schedule needs to offer special dispensation, and consequently, it won’t expire at the end of the year. It seems that CMS disagrees.
The Final Rule also addresses the definition of “direct supervision,” which is used for a variety of services incident to a physician, and diagnostic tests. Hopefully you know that the longstanding requirement that a physician be present in the office suite has been changed to permit supervision via smartphone or other audio-visual equipment. That definition is extended for another year, through the end of 2025. CMS is refusing to make it permanent while it considers patient safety implications. I find this somewhat strange, because if there truly were patient safety implications, permitting unsafe care through 2025 would be odd. But once again, I’m not in charge.
There are a handful of services for which CMS is going to permanently allow audio-visual supervision, including 99211s. But the key point is that through the end of 2025, direct supervision can be by smartphone.
There are several situations where the Fee Schedule focuses on the difference between “temporary” and “permanent” provisions. CMS has indicated that some telehealth codes are “permanent” and others that are “provisional.” But a permanent rule can be changed at any time. It’s no more “permanent” than life itself, so this seems like a distinction without a difference.
We are in a period of considerable uncertainty with respect to telehealth. Absent congressional action, many telehealth flexibilities expire Jan. 1. In particular, telehealth in urban areas for Medicare patients will become a near impossibility. CMS believes it lacks statutory authority to change that, and that we’re relying on action from the lame-duck Congress to fix it. Zelis folks like Matthew, Cate, and Adam will be keeping us up-to-date on that, and they have suggested that the odds of some congressional action are high.
I will close with a reminder. Direct supervision requires the ability to monitor visually, but you don’t need to actually use it. In short, the physician needn’t be like The Police, saying “every breath you take, I’ll be watching you.” As long as you have the ability to do it, you are good to go. (And CMS also said that if the patient’s technological challenges are the barrier to audio/visual communication, that generally doesn’t interfere with coverage.)
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: many hospitals and state Medicaid plans, under pressure from HR1 data analysis needs, are paying eye-watering markups to for-profit CPA and
As discussed last week, payments to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are adjusted to account for expected healthcare resource consumption by enrollees. Higher risk scores increase
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
