The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a lower court made a significant misstep by excluding crucial evidence in a case involving a staggering $400 million health insurance fraud scheme.
Buckle up, folks – this case is packed with legal jargon, alleged conspiracies, and some seriously questionable paperwork.
At the heart of this saga are three healthcare executives, who find themselves ensnared in allegations of a Medicaid fraud scheme that reportedly ran from 2000 to 2013. The alleged conspiracy involved a collaboration between Tenet Healthcare Corp. and Clinica de la Mama, which two of the alleged conspirators operated.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) alleges that this operation ensured that patients received childbirth services at Tenet facilities in exchange for kickbacks, clearly disguised as contracts for translation and paperwork services. Spoiler alert: they weren’t just doing their taxes.
Originally, prosecutors aimed to use out-of-court statements from alleged co-conspirators as evidence against the three executives. However, U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg ruled in 2022 that the government hadn’t convincingly demonstrated that the defendants knew their actions were illegal. This meant the court couldn’t admit the co-conspirator statements under the hearsay rule; think of it as trying to cook a gourmet meal without the right ingredients.
The Eleventh Circuit, however, had a different recipe in mind. In a decision that’s already stirring up debate among legal scholars, the court clarified that under the co-conspirator exclusion to the hearsay rule, prosecutors do not need to prove that a conspiracy was unlawful in order to admit co-conspirator statements. In layman’s terms, if you’re working together towards a goal, legal or otherwise, you might just find your statements making it to the courtroom.
The crux of the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling hinged on the interpretation of the word “conspiracy.” The judges argued that the term could simply refer to “the act of working together toward a shared goal,” not necessarily an illegal one. They noted that this definition is supported by both U.S. Supreme Court precedent and their sister circuits. Essentially, the judges suggested that if you and your friends decide to plan a surprise party (or an alleged healthcare fraud scheme), you might just be part of a “conspiracy” that merits some serious attention.
The Eleventh Circuit concluded that Judge Totenberg misapplied the standard for admissibility. They emphasized that the relevant question was whether the out-of-court statements were offered against an opposing party and were made in furtherance of a joint venture with that party. The Eleventh Circuit decision appears to nevertheless uphold the lower court’s application of the kickback statute and the standard for finding willfulness.
With the Eleventh Circuit remanding the case back to the lower court, there’s a lot to unpack. The district court will now have to reevaluate the admissibility of those tantalizing co-conspirator statements. It’s a second chance for the prosecutors, who are likely sharpening their legal pencils and preparing for another round in this courtroom saga.
The fallout from this ruling could set a significant precedent for future cases involving the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule. As the legal community watches closely, the implications for anti-kickback statute cases could be profound.
In a world where the intricacies of law often make your head spin, the Eleventh Circuit has delivered a ruling that could change the landscape for how conspiracies are defined and prosecuted. For the three aforementioned executives, it’s not just another day at the office – it’s the beginning of a new chapter in what’s shaping up to be a long and contentious legal battle.
As this case unfolds, one thing is certain: there will be plenty more legal drama ahead.
Stay tuned!
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Gloryanne Bryant has more than 40 years of experience in her field and is an independent HIM Coding and CDI Consultant who works
Anyone who has worked within the scope of hospital case/utilization management for any period of time has heard of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
