Cyber Week is here! Unleash savings from Nov. 20-29. Use code CYBER23 at checkout for 20% off your order. Hurry, exclusions apply! Don’t miss out on the biggest deals of the year!

The Wordy Whistleblower

The Wordy Whistleblower

The odds are high that there is someone in your organization who is seething at the perception that their boss is allowing, or even encouraging, improper behavior.

A client recently asked me to review one of the longest documents I’ve ever seen. It was written by a nurse who believes that her supervisor is trying to skew quality data.

This offers several lessons.

First, I really wish confidentiality didn’t prevent me from naming the client, because they’ve handled this remarkably well and deserve credit. The complaint was the length of a dissertation. It was also quite emotional. I have no doubt that in many organizations, those characteristics would have caused a quick dismissal of the merits of the complaint as the ramblings of a disgruntled employee. Instead, my client saw the meritorious matzo balls of the individual’s concerns buried in the emotional soup.

Too often, lengthy, emotional, or disorganized complaints are dismissed as meritless simply because of their style. That is very, very dangerous. One of my compliance mantras is that a stopped clock is still right twice a day. In this case, I don’t think that the employee is a stopped clock. Stretching the clock metaphor, they’re just wound too tightly by a supervisor who, over a couple of years, has incorrectly dismissed legitimate concerns. Because they were so tightly wound, they snapped. For people looking for a reason to ignore a complaint, the tome offered excuses. But there were true insights contained in the nearly 100 pages.

A second problem is that it’s much easier to create financial incentives that reward fishy behavior than incentives encouraging compliance. Let’s say your organization awards bonuses to people for achieving safety or quality goals.

That bonus will incentivize both legitimate and illegitimate methods of meeting the metrics. In the quality context, it will incentivize quality improvements, but it will also reward people who can rig the numbers. I am not suggesting that paying a bonus for quality improvements is unwise, or that the client’s system was poorly designed; it’s just impossible to develop any metric that can’t be gamed. It is, however, much harder to develop any really effective compliance-oriented metrics.

One of the few truly effective bonuses I can think of is a bonus linked to the percentage of supervisees who, in an anonymous survey, say that their supervisor encourages them to raise compliance concerns.

Another thing to be wary of is inconsistency. One of the employee’s legitimate beefs is that the organization limited their ability to document certain conditions without the approval of others. The only time such limitations existed was when the relevant documentation could hurt the organization. The same employee was freely permitted to document, without any review, characteristics that could help the organization. That double standard is low-hanging fruit for a government regulator.

Now, the good news is that the employee did bring the concern to compliance, rather than reporting to an outsider. But the concerns had festered for nearly two years. And the trigger for the complaint is my final point. The employee bringing the complaint was disciplined by their supervisor, who felt that the employee’s continued efforts to document in the record constituted insubordination because the supervisor had issued a directive to limit documentation. Honestly, I’m not quite sure what the lesson is here. On the one hand, I’m glad that something finally broke the logjam and brought the topic to compliance. But I wish the “something” hadn’t been what the employee understandably felt was a retaliatory act. 

Song lyrics don’t always translate well in an article, but this is a possible exception. In any organization with 100 or more employees, it’s hard for compliance to know everyone. But it’s good for compliance to take the words of Keri Noble’s 2004 Talk to Me to heart: ”There you are again. I see you all the time. We haven’t really met, but you know I know I don’t mind because I think today’s the day, I’m going to go right up to you and say ‘Would it be alright if I called you up sometime.’”

Having compliance professionals doing affirmative outreach to as many of your employees as possible is time and effort well spent. If you can’t do it in person, do it via email or a survey. But in person is far superior.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Print

David M. Glaser, Esq.

David M. Glaser is a shareholder in Fredrikson & Byron's Health Law Group. David assists clinics, hospitals, and other health care entities negotiate the maze of healthcare regulations, providing advice about risk management, reimbursement, and business planning issues. He has considerable experience in healthcare regulation and litigation, including compliance, criminal and civil fraud investigations, and reimbursement disputes. David's goal is to explain the government's enforcement position, and to analyze whether this position is supported by the law or represents government overreaching. David is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is a popular guest on Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Revolutionize Case Management and Revenue Cycle Team Collaboration to Improve Patient and Financial Outcomes

Revolutionize Case Management and Revenue Cycle Team Collaboration to Improve Patient and Financial Outcomes

Unlock the keys to bridging the clinical-finance disconnect by transforming your approach to revenue cycle collaboration for superior patient care and financial prosperity!

Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he delves into the pivotal connection between case management, utilization review, and hospital revenue cycles, unveiling strategies to enhance communication and align goals effectively. Discover how to overcome hidden challenges hindering seamless collaboration and gain insights imperative for success

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
December 7, 2023
Mastering the Two-Midnight Rule: Keys to Navigating Short-Stay Admissions with Confidence

Mastering the Two-Midnight Rule: Keys to Navigating Short-Stay Admissions with Confidence

The CMS Two-Midnight Rule and short-stay audits are here to stay, impacting inpatient and outpatient admissions, ASC procedures, and Medicare Parts C & D. New for 2024, the Two-Midnight Rule applies to Medicare Advantage patients, requiring differentiation between Medicare plans affecting Case Managers, Utilization Review, and operational processes and knowledge of a vital distinction between these patients that influences post-discharge medical reviews and compliance risk. Join Michael G. Calahan for a comprehensive webcast covering federal laws for all admission processes. Gain the knowledge needed to navigate audits effectively and optimize patient access points, personnel, and compliance strategies. Learn Two-Midnight Rule essentials, Medicare Advantage implications, and compliance best practices. Discover operational insights for short-stay admissions, outpatient observation, and the ever-changing Inpatient-Only Listing.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
September 19, 2023
Unlocking Clinical Documentation Excellence: Empowering CDISs & Coders

Unlocking Clinical Documentation Excellence: How to Engage the Provider

Uncover effective techniques to foster provider understanding of CDI, empower CDISs and coders to customize their queries for enhanced effectiveness, and learn to engage adult learners, leveraging their experiences for superior learning outcomes. Elevate your CDI expertise, leading to fewer coding errors, reduced claim denials, and minimized audit issues.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
December 14, 2023
Coding for Spinal Procedures: A 2-Part Webcast Series

Coding for Spinal Procedures: A 2-Part Webcast Series

This exclusive ICD10monitor webcast series will help you acquire the critical knowledge you need to completely and accurately assign ICD-10-PCS and CPT® codes for spinal fusion and other common spinal procedures.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
October 26, 2023
Inpatient Spinal Fusions: Mastering Anatomy, Coding and Documentation

Inpatient Spinal Fusions: Mastering Anatomy, Coding and Documentation

During this exclusive ICD10monitor webcast, inpatient coders will gain a profound understanding of prevalent spinal procedures. They’ll delve into the intricate anatomy, grasp the purpose and method behind these procedures, uncover essential elements within physician documentation, and receive expert guidance, step by step, on constructing accurate ICD-10-PCS codes. It’s the key to enhancing their expertise and ensuring coding precision.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
October 26, 2023

Trending News