SNMMI Criticizes CMS Final Decision on Amyloid PET Coverage

CMS reached its final judgment on coverage for FDA-approved monoclonal antibodies. These antibodies are used against amyloid for the purposes of Alzheimer’s disease treatment. The service occurs under Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) in FDA-approved, CMS-approved, or NIH-sponsored controlled trials with the national coverage determination (NCD) originally proposed in January. To the great disappointment of advocates, CMS finalized the decision to include no additional coverage for beta-amyloid PET scans. Even more, the PET scans will remain under the present policy, which contains massive restrictions including providing coverage only when meeting requirements for clinical trial protocol. Another striking aspect is the reality that the restriction imposed is limited to only one per patient per lifetime. The decision by CMS is a blow to the many groups including radiology stakeholders like the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) who have put forth effort into Alzheimer’s disease advocacy, promoting sharp comments in rebuke.

Comments and Consequences

Alzheimer’s remains a massive threat to healthcare and public health. According to the Alzheimer’s Association, one in three seniors dies of this disease or a related dementia, with over 6 million Americans living with the disease presently. This number is projected to skyrocket to 13 million by 2050. Even more, the COVID-19 pandemic has given fuel to the fire, with the association stating, “In 2020, COVID-19 contributed to a 17% increase in Alzheimer’s and dementia deaths.” The staggering cost in 2022 is expected to reach $321 billion nationwide for healthcare related to this disease and other dementias. This unfortunately is only one slope of the economic avalanche, with an estimated 11 million Americans providing unpaid care, and “In 2021, these caregivers provided more than 16 billion hours of care valued at nearly $272 billion.”

Comments and Consequences

The implications of Alzheimer’s and related dementias to healthcare are alarming, creating an imperative for advocacy related to the disease such as the future of amyloid PET. Understandably, any decision made by CMS related to this topic will be met with backlash and controversy.

SNMMI made several points in an online statement last month in regard to the decision. One of the surprises that SNMMI notes about the decision is that “In stark contrast, the decision explicitly covers other tests for detection of beta amyloid (e.g., cerebral spinal fluid) without limitation, despite the fact that beta-amyloid PET is the standard of care—and, in fact, the only test approved by the FDA—for detecting beta amyloid.”

SNMMI had rallied for the coverage of beta-amyloid PET scans, previously sending detailed arguments in multiple letters to CMS, expressing the advantages, especially in contrast against the use of cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers, to guarantee correct and timely Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis.

The society notes that at present beta-amyloid PET is the only biomarker with FDA approval with the objective of detecting beta-amyloid plaque, and the only one available for detection of beta-amyloid plaque in the brain. As SNMMI explained at length in their previous letters, “There is no evidence to suggest that a single amyloid PET scan per patient is appropriate or that a scan performed years ago can provide the diagnostic information needed to determine whether a patient is currently a candidate for therapy. CMS should allow as many PET scans as are needed to ensure that any trial design is optimal and reliable and provides physicians with the information they need to make informed decisions about initiating and continuing therapy.”

Stakeholders also took note of the silence surrounding the removal or retirement of the beta-amyloid PET NCD. Pre-trial beta-amyloid PET scans are the hallmark for the identification of amyloid plague in the brain. Pre-trial beta-amyloid scans are a tool for weeding out any patients who may not obtain benefit from monoclonal antibody treatment, “sparing them the stress and anxiety of participating in a clinical trial for a product that will not be beneficial as well as the potential negative effects of drug-related toxicities.”

Another point of contention surrounds the failure to remove the CED requirement since it would have been timed with the approval of both aducanumab and the coverage of tau PET diagnostics which were approved on January 1. Acting on this recommendation would have aided in keeping fair access to the new therapy. Furthermore, SNMMI points out that “It is ironic that patients now have access to a potentially unlimited number of tau PET scans but are limited to only one amyloid PET scan, and, even then, only as part of a clinical trial. Further, access will be limited by current CMS rules that systematically under-reimburse for amyloid PET scans due to bundling in the outpatient hospital setting.”

One point that was welcome by the society and other stakeholders was the fact that CMS took time to clarify requirements associated with a qualifying randomized controlled trial and the understanding that CMS has decided not to put limits or restrictions regarding the location of service in the final NCD.

The society stresses that it will continue to scrutinize the final NCD and keep members in the loop in regard to any continued conversations with CMS. Although SNMMI was disappointed in the lack of further coverage inclusion for amyloid PET scans, the society did acknowledge the reality that in terms of monoclonal antibodies, “CMS’s final decision to cover monoclonal antibodies that have been FDA approved based on clinical efficacy rather than surrogate biomarkers—and as part of a registry rather than a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial—is a step forward.” For amyloid PET, the fight is not over. SNMMI reassured its members that it will advocate, striving to obtain “broad national coverage of amyloid PET scans by either a positive NCD or through Medicare Administrative Contractor discretion.”

Information Sources:

http://www.snmmi.org/newspublications/NewsDetail.aspx?ItemNumber=40305

https://www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/facts-figures#:~:text=More%20than%206%20million%20Americans,with%20Alzheimer’s%20or%20another%20dementi

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Bryan Nordley

Bryan Nordley is a seasoned professional writer, strategist, and researcher with over a decade’s worth of combined experience. Bryan launched his professional health writing career at the University of British Columbia’s Faculty of Medicine, one of the top 30 faculty of medicine programs in the world, working under the School of Public Health as a communications assistant. From there, he expanded his expertise and knowledge into private healthcare and podiatry before taking the role of healthcare writer at MedLearn Media. Bryan is the lead writer for the MedLearn Publishing brand previously producing both the acclaimed radiology and laboratory compliance manager newsletter products, while currently writing the compliance questions of the week which reach over 10,000 subscribers, creating the MedLearn Publishing Insights blogs and collaborating with operations and nationally renowned subject matter experts, in addition to serving as an editor for a variety of MedLearn publications along with marketing initiatives. Bryan continues to keep his pulse on the latest healthcare industry news, analyzing and reporting with strategic insight.

Related Stories

You Down with CfC?

You Down with CfC?

Anyone who has worked within the scope of hospital case/utilization management for any period of time has heard of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24