Treating “Since You Are Here” Syndrome

Treating “Since You are Here” Syndrome

In a recent article in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, a rheumatologist at a teaching hospital lamented about “hospital problems,” a recent phenomenon wherein patients are not allowed to stay in the hospital when they no longer have medical necessity for hospital care, even though the physician may want to keep the patient longer to wait for test results or get them prepped for a test.

He proceeds to blame this loss of physician autonomy on the development of hospitalists as a specialty, the increasing employment of physicians by health systems, and “business majors.” His patient, who required a kidney biopsy but no longer required hospital care, was not allowed to stay the three days necessary to allow aspirin to clear, in order to safely proceed with the procedure.

What this physician may not realize is that in many if not most hospitals, patients requiring hospital care are being held in hallway beds in the emergency department for hours or days due to lack of inpatient beds – and patients requiring non-emergent surgery are having their procedures postponed due to lack of inpatient beds for their post-operative care. This lack of inpatient bed capacity is multifactorial, with limited capacity in post-acute care settings and patients’ lack of ability to afford such care when needed, resulting in patients occupying acute-care beds when that care level is not necessary.

In addition, hospitals are often constrained in their ability to adequately staff ancillary departments such as physical therapy, extending patients’ hospital stays while they are awaiting necessary assessments.

And while it would be convenient for the patient to remain in the hospital awaiting the biopsy, hospital confinement imposes risks to patients, including exposure to nosocomial infections, medication errors, effects of sleep deprivation, and other healthcare-acquired conditions. The financial aspects can also not be ignored. Most hospital admissions are paid as a single payment covering all care provided during the stay. A discussion of the profitability of nonprofit hospitals and their executive salaries is beyond the scope of this article, but adding three days of convenient hospital care, including the required nursing care and daily physician visits, without any additional reimbursement is not a sustainable model to expand services to all in need.

This physician does express hope that “value-based payment models may break down the barriers between inpatient and outpatient medicine.” The term “value” itself has components of quality, safety, and experience divided by cost. Using principles of “since you are here” methodology not only adds to the cost; it also compromises quality and safety, and thus decreases the value of care markedly. These would not be “value-added” services for the patient or the hospital. They would do more harm than good by creating increased competition for already scarce resources. This happens all too frequently, not only with ordering services and consultations that could be deferred to the non-hospital setting.  

There is no equity in using highly paid clinical staff to provide hospital care to a stable patient awaiting a procedure that can be safely done after discharge, while a patient with sepsis needs to be transferred to another facility because the ICU is filled – partially with patients awaiting transfer to a medical bed, but there are no medical beds available. Medicine in the U.S. is evolving to be specialized, and that’s why many specialists such as rheumatology or dermatology rarely admit patients and are less aware of the issues unique to the hospital environment. A consult to a rheumatologist for this patient in many hospitals would probably get a response that “I will see this patient in the clinic.” Using precious hospital beds to carry out outpatient work would be antithetical to the very idea of the right patient receiving the right service in the right setting.  What we are missing is seamless communication, shared ownership, and missed opportunities to remove psychosocial barriers for patients to meet goals for their healthcare.

We offer a simpler solution here. Develop a relationship with the hospital’s care management staff. They can provide that bridge between settings, helping to arrange outpatient follow-up and testing, communicating with the patient so they do not miss their appointment, and ensuring that the results of testing are conveyed to the patient and the physician so they can get the best of care in the most appropriate setting.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Deepak Goyal, MD

Dr. Deepak Manmohan Goyal is an Internal Medicine trained Board Certified Physician who is currently serving as Executive Medical Director of Revenue Cycle and Supply Chain at Monument Health in Rapid City, SD. He serves as Chairman of Utilization Review Committee at Monument Health and is a key leader for driving lot of system level initiatives.

With more than 20 years of progressive responsibility in various medical fields, Dr. Goyal’s diverse medical experience spans surgery, orthopedics, emergency services, primary care, and hospitalist services. His executive experience includes Medical Director, Chief of Staff, and Program Director of Hospital Medicine. Dr. Goyal has been a national speaker at prestigious conferences like ACMA, AHRMM, HFMA and IDN in areas of resource utilization and improving value in health care.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24